Artists contributing to Adobe Stock are unhappy with the way Adobe has used their work to train its AI models. The company’s AI art generator, Firefly, draws on existing images to create unique visual assets that don’t infringe existing intellectual property. However, contributors to the stock photo site have expressed concerns, with some hinting at the use of their artwork without express permission being unethical and others disputing Adobe’s ethical claim to have creators at the centre of its generative AI. While it is legal under Adobe Stock’s terms of service, some in the artistic community are calling for greater opt-out and notification options to prevent AI-generated images from eroding the market for their real-world stock photography.
Creators criticize Adobe for training Firefly AI.
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Phenomenal AI Launches India’s First Text-to-Video AI Platform
Transform video creation with Phenomenal AI's pioneering text-to-video platform in India, revolutionizing content creation with AI technology.
ZDNET’s Expert Tech Recommendations: Unbiased Reviews & Advice
Discover ZDNet's unbiased tech reviews & advice on AI models Claude & ChatGPT. Learn how to effectively use Claude for tasks requiring deeper understanding.
Telugu Cultural Heritage Datathon: Preserving Language & Tradition
Join the Telugu Cultural Heritage Datathon to preserve language & tradition with ITE&C, IIITH, and industry partners. Exciting opportunity!
China Teams Up with Tesla to Boost Compute Capacity, Alarming US
China partners with Tesla to boost compute capacity, stirring concerns in the US about technological advancements.