US Lawyer Apologizes for Fabricating ChatGPT-Generated Cases

Date:

New York-based lawyer Steven Schwartz has issued an apology to a judge after using OpenAI’s ChatGPT, an advanced language model, to prepare a crucial court filing, only to discover that the programme generated fabricated cases and rulings. The incident took place during the proceedings of Roberto Mata‘s civil case at the Manhattan federal court, where Mata is suing Colombian airline Avianca. Schwartz filed a response to Avianca’s lawyers’ request to dismiss the case with claims citing judicial decisions, including Petersen v. Iran Air, Varghese v. China Southern Airlines and Shaboon v. Egyptair. However, neither Avianca’s lawyer nor the presiding judge could locate those cases, leading to Schwartz admitting that ChatGPT had fabricated the entire response. Schwartz expressed his regret and apologized for the incident, which he claimed was not his intention to mislead the court. This incident proves that AI tools still rely on human supervision and judgement.

See also  ChatGPT Faces Defamation Lawsuit for the First Time in Its History

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the incident that led to the apology of Steven Schwartz?

Steven Schwartz used OpenAI's ChatGPT to prepare a court filing for Roberto Mata's civil case against Avianca, only to discover that the programme generated fabricated cases and rulings.

What did Schwartz claim in his response to Avianca's lawyers' request to dismiss the case?

Schwartz cited judicial decisions including Petersen v. Iran Air, Varghese v. China Southern Airlines and Shaboon v. Egyptair.

What happened when Avianca's lawyer and the presiding judge tried to locate the cases cited by Schwartz?

They could not locate those cases, leading to Schwartz admitting that ChatGPT had fabricated the entire response.

Did Schwartz intend to mislead the court?

No, Schwartz claimed that it was not his intention to mislead the court.

What lesson can be learned from this incident?

The incident proves that AI tools still rely on human supervision and judgement.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Samsung Unpacked Event Teases Exciting AI Features for Galaxy Z Fold 6 and More

Discover the latest AI features for Galaxy Z Fold 6 and more at Samsung's Unpacked event on July 10. Stay tuned for exciting updates!

Revolutionizing Ophthalmology: Quantum Computing’s Impact on Eye Health

Explore how quantum computing is changing ophthalmology with faster information processing and better treatment options.

Are You Missing Out on Nvidia? You May Already Be a Millionaire!

Don't miss out on Nvidia's AI stock potential - could turn $25,000 into $1 million! Dive into tech investments for huge returns!

Revolutionizing Business Growth Through AI & Machine Learning

Revolutionize your business growth with AI & Machine Learning. Learn six ways to use ML in your startup and drive success.