Tag: Sanctions

Lawyers must exercise caution when relying on AI for legal research. A recent case in the Southern District of NY saw a generative AI program fabricating citations and decisions used by lawyers, leading to sanctions from the court. While AI has revolutionized legal research and drafting, human supervision and independent verification remain critical to avoid fabricated information. Non-lawyers using AI for legal questions should be cautious and double-check the output for accuracy. The incident highlights the need to understand AI limitations and use it only as a tool in legal contexts.

Avianca airline wins case against lawyer submitting fake legal cases. Lawyer Michael LoDuca blamed ChatGPT's bad advice for the fake cases which may lead to sanctions.

NY attorney faces sanctions for citing fake legal cases in Avianca lawsuit after using AI-powered research platform ChatGPT. Importance of reviewing AI-provided information highlighted.

Discover ChatGPT, the AI chatbot used for customer service, content generation, and even legal research. A seasoned NY lawyer, Steven A. Schwartz, admitted to citing bogus cases in a legal brief after using ChatGPT for research. Learn more about his case and potential consequences now.

Lawyer reprimanded for attempting to use fake ChatGPT-generated cases during a hearing for personal injury case against an airline. ChatGPT not designed for detecting AI content. Importance of understanding technology emphasized.