ChatGPT has been dubbed both an exciting technology and a source of unease. It is an advanced AI-based chatbot designed to process huge amounts of information in a short span of time, leaving some feeling optimistic and others concerned about the consequences for humanity. Is this apprehension and enthusiasm justified?
To verify the validity of ChatGPT’s database I contacted it about somebody I know very well – myself. The answers contained no truth and instead were more like stories from a fiction author. They included details such as book titles I’d written that never actually existed, reviews from English and French reviewers, and sections from articles. The provided links offered no supporting sources or facts. The posts and books I have in fact written, however, were absent from ChatGPT’s database.
This AI system creates myths instead of meaningful insights. Instead of facilitating understanding and trust, it excels in creating false and misleading impressions which have the potential to damage reputations and careers.
The revolution in information technology promised by AI has yet to start. We have to remember that ChatGPT is not reliable or trustworthy and its use should be approached with caution. Fake information is circulating on the web and conversational agents can add to the problem of misinformation. Our vigilance will remain to be of utmost importance when it comes to online data.
The mentioned company in the article is ChatGPT. Developed by the Montreal-based startup Humani, it is an AI-powered chatbot which propels the computational process to a whole new level. It is designed to generate quick and accurate results to increase the efficiency of many online activities, from customer service to medical diagnosis. Featuring intuitive natural language processing, ChatGPT is touted for its adept ability to understand conversations with humans and its ability to deliver fast and accurate results.
The person mentioned in the article is the author of the article. This author seeks to unravel the truth behind ChatGPT’s influence, going as far as to use it to learn more about him or herself. While the author finds none of his or her own writings among the ChatGPT database, they find it populated with stories of fiction and impossible scenarios. This discovery leads the author to conclude that ChatGPT is a myth, and its use should be approached with caution when it comes to personal data.
