Chilean Bill Sparks Debate on AI Regulation
A bill introduced to the Chilean Chamber of Deputies in April has raised concerns and debate over the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, robotics, and related technologies. The bill aims to address the widespread impact and adoption of these technologies.
However, experts from Notus, a software development and AI company under the consultancy firm Matrix Consulting, believe that the bill’s definition of AI systems is too broad. They argue that requiring authorization from the National Artificial Intelligence Commission for all development, use, and commercialization could hinder entrepreneurship and impede the generation of new ideas. Pablo Senosiain, General Manager of Notus, warns that such restrictions may leave Chile lagging behind in the AI revolution.
Luis Felipe Ross, partner of Matrix Consulting, shares this view and emphasizes the need to promote responsible development of AI without limiting its potential. He describes AI as a fundamental change and disruption whose full impact is yet to be seen. Ross stresses that Chile cannot afford to be left out of the game.
Notus suggests a more practical approach by focusing on systems deemed high-risk or unacceptable. They propose reviewing guidelines from other regions, like the European Union, and adapting them without imposing excessive restrictions on development.
The bill categorizes AI systems into two groups: unacceptable risk and high risk. Unacceptable risk systems include those that employ subliminal techniques to alter behavior, exploit vulnerabilities in specific groups, or are used by public authorities to evaluate individuals’ reliability. Real-time or deferred biometric identification systems in public spaces are also deemed unacceptable risk, with some exceptions mentioned in the bill.
On the other hand, high-risk AI systems comprise those used for remote biometric identification in private spaces, management of utilities like water and electricity, access control in educational institutions, student evaluation, employee selection and performance monitoring, and credit rating assessment.
The proposed legislation establishes the creation of the National Artificial Intelligence Commission. This body would be responsible for reviewing authorization requests from developers, providers, and users of AI systems, as well as formulating recommendations to enhance AI regulation.
The bill also outlines obligations and responsibilities for developers, providers, and users of AI systems. Developers must ensure safety, reliability, and transparency in their systems’ operation while respecting human rights and freedoms during design and development. Suppliers are tasked with guaranteeing compliance with legal standards, and users are expected to utilize AI systems responsibly and ethically.
As the bill progresses through the constitutional process, these differing viewpoints highlight the importance of finding a balanced approach to AI regulation in Chile. Striking the right balance will not only foster innovation and entrepreneurship but also ensure the responsible and ethical use of AI technology.
End of article.
