US Senators call for assessment of harm caused by Generative AI

Date:

US Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for a detailed technology assessment of generative artificial intelligence (AI), stating it carries serious harms. In a letter to the head of the Government Accountability Office, Markey and Peters cited risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information. The letter calls generative AI a double-edged sword and argues that Congress urgently needs non-partisan, technical expertise to understand the costs of the technology. Tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

See also  Canada's Privacy Regulator Challenges OpenAI's ChatGPT

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is generative artificial intelligence (AI)?

Generative AI refers to technology that is capable of creating or generating new content, such as voice, text, or images, based on previously analyzed data.

Why have US Senators called for a technology assessment of generative AI?

Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for such an assessment because they believe generative AI carries serious harms, including risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information.

Can generative AI be both beneficial and harmful?

Yes, as referred to in the letter by Markey and Peters, generative AI is a double-edged sword, meaning that while it has the potential to benefit society, it can also cause harm if not properly regulated and overseen.

Why does Congress need non-partisan technical expertise to understand the costs of generative AI?

Congress needs non-partisan technical expertise in order to fully understand the potential negative consequences of generative AI, as well as the benefits, and make informed decisions on proper regulation and oversight.

Have concerns about generative AI been raised before?

Yes, tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Anaya Kapoor
Anaya Kapoor
Anaya is our dedicated writer and manager for the ChatGPT Latest News category. With her finger on the pulse of the AI community, Anaya keeps readers up to date with the latest developments, breakthroughs, and applications of ChatGPT. Her articles provide valuable insights into the rapidly evolving landscape of conversational AI.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.