Unreleased John Lennon Beatles Track Now and Then Revived with Artificial Intelligence

Date:

Unreleased John Lennon Beatles Track Now and Then Revived with Artificial Intelligence

In a groundbreaking development, an unreleased track by John Lennon, one of the legendary members of The Beatles, has been resurrected using artificial intelligence (AI). Titled Now and Then, the song was recorded by Lennon in the late 1970s but never saw the light of day. The remaining Beatles members, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and George Harrison, made numerous attempts to recover the lost songs of their late bandmate. Decades later, AI technology finally made it possible to revive Now and Then, sparking a debate about the ethics surrounding the use of a deceased artist’s voice and artistic legacy.

The journey of bringing Now and Then back to life began in 1994 when Yoko Ono, John Lennon’s wife, presented a tape labeled For Paul to the group. While they managed to recover other tracks like Free As a Bird and Real Love, they struggled to separate the vocals and piano from Now and Then to blend them with other music due to the limitations of their technology at the time. Consequently, the song remained consigned to the box of memories.

However, hope emerged when acclaimed director Peter Jackson and his team developed software during the production of the documentary ‘Get Back.’ This software proved instrumental in separating Lennon’s voice on the original demo tape over a year ago. Giles Martin, son of the late George Martin, then produced an early mix of Now and Then. Jackson, expressing his enthusiasm for the song, revealed that he had listened to it more than 50 times purely for pleasure.

See also  Elliptic Releases 200M Bitcoin Transactions to Combat Money Laundering

The Beatles group asserts that they have not altered John Lennon’s voice, a contentious ethical dilemma inherent in this particular case. Nevertheless, in 2023, the band reunited to contribute their musical talents to the song, with McCartney on bass and piano and Starr on drums. Harrison’s guitar, which fell silent after his passing in 2001, has also been reintegrated into the track. Giles Martin added a string arrangement, and some additional backing vocals were incorporated as well.

The use of AI technology in this endeavor has sparked considerable debate. Press releases have gone back and forth, with references to artificial intelligence being removed from the narrative. Nevertheless, Paul McCartney had previously acknowledged the involvement of AI. With no clear regulatory framework in place, the boundaries remain undefined, though discussions around this topic have flared up during the Hollywood writers’ and actors’ strikes.

Opinions on the matter are divided, but some view the revival of Now and Then as a positive outcome. Musician Igor Paskual believes it is good that it has been recovered since we are in dire need of beauty in these challenging times. He further emphasizes that there is a human fear of machine-driven art, which ultimately stems from a fear within ourselves of not being on par with technology.

As the controversy surrounding the use of AI in artistic endeavors continues, the revival of John Lennon’s Now and Then brings to the forefront the complex ethical questions at hand. While the song’s return is undoubtedly a cause for celebration for Beatles fans worldwide, it serves as a crucial moment for reflection on the intersecting realms of technology, art, and the preservation of an artist’s legacy.

See also  Apple's Concern Over New Jon Stewart Show Sparks Controversy, US

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the significance of the unreleased John Lennon track Now and Then?

Now and Then is an unreleased track recorded by John Lennon in the late 1970s. It has gained significance because it remained unreleased until now, and its revival using artificial intelligence has sparked a debate about the ethics surrounding the use of a deceased artist's voice and artistic legacy.

How was the Now and Then track recovered after being lost for decades?

The remaining Beatles members, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and George Harrison, made attempts to recover the lost songs of John Lennon. However, it was not until acclaimed director Peter Jackson and his team developed software during the production of the documentary 'Get Back' that they were able to separate Lennon's voice on the original demo tape. Giles Martin then produced an early mix of Now and Then.

Has John Lennon's voice been altered in the revived track?

The Beatles group asserts that they have not altered John Lennon's voice in the revived track. However, the use of artificial intelligence technology to separate his vocals has raised ethical concerns and sparked considerable debate.

Who else contributed to the revived Now and Then track?

In 2023, the Beatles reunited to contribute their musical talents to the song. Paul McCartney played bass and piano, Ringo Starr played drums, and George Harrison's guitar, recorded before his passing in 2001, has also been reintegrated into the track. Giles Martin added a string arrangement, and additional backing vocals were incorporated as well.

How has the use of AI technology in the revival of Now and Then been received?

The use of AI technology in reviving Now and Then has sparked considerable debate, with opinions being divided. Some see it as a positive outcome, while others have ethical concerns about the use of machine-driven art and the boundaries surrounding the technology's involvement in artistic endeavors.

Is there a regulatory framework in place for the use of AI in artistic endeavors?

As of now, there is no clear regulatory framework in place for the use of AI in artistic endeavors. The boundaries and ethical considerations surrounding AI's involvement in art and the preservation of an artist's legacy remain undefined.

What are some opinions on the revival of Now and Then using AI?

Musician Igor Paskual views the revival as a positive outcome, emphasizing the need for beauty in challenging times. He also highlights a human fear of machine-driven art, which he believes stems from a fear of not being on par with technology. However, opinions on the matter are varied.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Microsoft Unveils Copilot+ PCs: Mind-Blowing AI Speed and Smarts Await!

Experience mind-blowing AI speed and smarts with Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs. Pre-order now and revolutionize your computing experience!

Global AI Summit in Seoul: Leaders Discuss Safe and Sustainable Regulations

Join global leaders at the AI Seoul Summit 2024 to discuss safe and sustainable AI regulations. Learn more about the future of AI development!

PwC Study: AI Skills Boost Wages by 25% Globally

Discover how AI skills can boost wages by 25% globally and revolutionize productivity in the global economy. Gain insights from the PwC study.

Scarlett Johansson Accuses OpenAI of Cloning Her Voice

Scarlett Johansson accuses OpenAI of cloning her voice without consent for their ChatGPT project. Debate on ethics of voice cloning sparked.