UK Government Takes Action on Biases in Medical Devices

Date:

The U.K. government has pledged to take action to address bias in medical devices after an independent review highlighted widespread concerns. The report identified potential biases in devices such as pulse oximeters, AI-enabled devices, and genomics.

Chair of the review, Professor Dame Margaret Whitehead, emphasized the importance of addressing biases that could harm certain groups in the population, including women, ethnic minorities, and disadvantaged socio-economic groups. The review revealed how existing biases in society can be unintentionally incorporated into AI-enabled medical devices, leading to potential injustices.

The report found that clinical trials and research excluded certain populations, leading to poorly worded regulations and standards in the design and development of medical devices. For example, pulse oximeters were found to be less accurate for patients with darker skin tones, potentially resulting in delays in treatment.

In response to the findings, the government has updated guidance on the use of pulse oximeters and is requesting applicants for new medical devices to address bias in their designs. Additionally, plans are in place to improve the transparency of data used in developing AI-based medical devices and products that influence clinical decisions.

Experts have welcomed the report and government response, with calls for further action to address inequalities in healthcare. Professor Chris Holmes has urged the government to appoint an expert panel to assess unintended consequences of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the need to incorporate equity considerations in medical devices.

While changes are necessary to address biases in medical devices, healthcare spokesperson Professor Peter Bannister has cautioned that implementing solutions, particularly in AI technologies, must be done carefully to avoid amplifying existing societal biases.

See also  NeuroBell Secures Funding to Launch Life-Saving Seizure Detection Device for Newborns, Ireland

In conclusion, the U.K. government’s commitment to addressing bias in medical devices is a significant step towards promoting equity and fairness in healthcare. Collaboration with experts and stakeholders will be crucial in ensuring that future advancements in medical technology prioritize inclusivity and accuracy in patient care.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What prompted the U.K. government to take action on biases in medical devices?

An independent review highlighted concerns about biases in devices such as pulse oximeters, AI-enabled devices, and genomics.

Who chaired the review on biases in medical devices?

Professor Dame Margaret Whitehead chaired the review on biases in medical devices.

Which populations were identified as potentially being harmed by biases in medical devices?

Women, ethnic minorities, and disadvantaged socio-economic groups were identified as potentially being harmed by biases in medical devices.

What specific issue was found with pulse oximeters in the review?

Pulse oximeters were found to be less accurate for patients with darker skin tones, potentially resulting in delays in treatment.

How has the government responded to the findings of the review?

The government has updated guidance on the use of pulse oximeters and is requesting applicants for new medical devices to address bias in their designs. Plans are also in place to improve the transparency of data used in developing AI-based medical devices.

What further action has been suggested by experts to address biases in healthcare?

Experts have called for the government to appoint an expert panel to assess unintended consequences of AI in healthcare and to ensure that equity considerations are incorporated into medical devices.

What caution has been given by Professor Peter Bannister regarding implementing solutions to bias in medical devices?

Professor Peter Bannister has cautioned that implementing solutions, particularly in AI technologies, must be done carefully to avoid amplifying existing societal biases.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

AI Startups Flourish, Attracting $27 Billion in U.S. Funding: PitchBook

AI startups in the U.S. attract $27B in funding, reflecting industry resilience and growth potential. Find out more from PitchBook.

Elon Musk Warns Bill Gates of Annihilation Over Tesla Bet

Elon Musk vs. Bill Gates: Tesla's Future as an AI colossus. Can Musk's $30 trillion vision become a reality? Stay tuned for updates.

OnePlus Watch 2 Price Slashed by Rs 1,000 in India: Dual OS, AMOLED Display, 100 Sports Modes

Looking for a high-quality smartwatch? Check out the OnePlus Watch 2 with a Rs 1,000 price cut, AMOLED display, and 100 sports modes in India!

Discover How ChatGPT Can Revolutionize Your Website Efficiency

Learn how ChatGPT can transform your website's productivity and enhance user experience. A must-have for efficient online communication.