UK Government Takes Action on Biases in Medical Devices

Date:

The U.K. government has pledged to take action to address bias in medical devices after an independent review highlighted widespread concerns. The report identified potential biases in devices such as pulse oximeters, AI-enabled devices, and genomics.

Chair of the review, Professor Dame Margaret Whitehead, emphasized the importance of addressing biases that could harm certain groups in the population, including women, ethnic minorities, and disadvantaged socio-economic groups. The review revealed how existing biases in society can be unintentionally incorporated into AI-enabled medical devices, leading to potential injustices.

The report found that clinical trials and research excluded certain populations, leading to poorly worded regulations and standards in the design and development of medical devices. For example, pulse oximeters were found to be less accurate for patients with darker skin tones, potentially resulting in delays in treatment.

In response to the findings, the government has updated guidance on the use of pulse oximeters and is requesting applicants for new medical devices to address bias in their designs. Additionally, plans are in place to improve the transparency of data used in developing AI-based medical devices and products that influence clinical decisions.

Experts have welcomed the report and government response, with calls for further action to address inequalities in healthcare. Professor Chris Holmes has urged the government to appoint an expert panel to assess unintended consequences of AI in healthcare, emphasizing the need to incorporate equity considerations in medical devices.

While changes are necessary to address biases in medical devices, healthcare spokesperson Professor Peter Bannister has cautioned that implementing solutions, particularly in AI technologies, must be done carefully to avoid amplifying existing societal biases.

See also  AI Scoring Systems Fall Short in Evaluating Radiology Performance, Harvard Study Finds

In conclusion, the U.K. government’s commitment to addressing bias in medical devices is a significant step towards promoting equity and fairness in healthcare. Collaboration with experts and stakeholders will be crucial in ensuring that future advancements in medical technology prioritize inclusivity and accuracy in patient care.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What prompted the U.K. government to take action on biases in medical devices?

An independent review highlighted concerns about biases in devices such as pulse oximeters, AI-enabled devices, and genomics.

Who chaired the review on biases in medical devices?

Professor Dame Margaret Whitehead chaired the review on biases in medical devices.

Which populations were identified as potentially being harmed by biases in medical devices?

Women, ethnic minorities, and disadvantaged socio-economic groups were identified as potentially being harmed by biases in medical devices.

What specific issue was found with pulse oximeters in the review?

Pulse oximeters were found to be less accurate for patients with darker skin tones, potentially resulting in delays in treatment.

How has the government responded to the findings of the review?

The government has updated guidance on the use of pulse oximeters and is requesting applicants for new medical devices to address bias in their designs. Plans are also in place to improve the transparency of data used in developing AI-based medical devices.

What further action has been suggested by experts to address biases in healthcare?

Experts have called for the government to appoint an expert panel to assess unintended consequences of AI in healthcare and to ensure that equity considerations are incorporated into medical devices.

What caution has been given by Professor Peter Bannister regarding implementing solutions to bias in medical devices?

Professor Peter Bannister has cautioned that implementing solutions, particularly in AI technologies, must be done carefully to avoid amplifying existing societal biases.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.