A New York law firm, Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, and two of their lawyers have been ordered by a senior federal judge, P. Kevin Castel, to explain why they submitted a brief containing references to fake cases. According to an affidavit filed by lawyer Steven A. Schwartz, who is representing plaintiff Roberto Mata in a lawsuit against airline Avianca Inc., ChatGPT provided the references to the fake cases. ChatGPT is a natural language processing AI chatbot, owned by OpenAI, that is designed to answer legal questions posed in plain English. Schwartz has been in practice for over 30 years and stated that he was unaware that the content he received from ChatGPT could be false.
Title: Judge Discovers Reason for Citing Nonexistent Cases in Legal Brief – ChatGPT Conducted Investigation A judge has finally uncovered the cause for the citation of false cases in a legal brief, as ChatGPT conducted an investigation into the matter.
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.