Avianca Inc., one of the largest airlines in Colombia, is embroiled in litigation with Roberto Mata. A 10-page brief of citations was submitted by Mata’s lawyers, however none could be verified. It was later revealed that lawyer Steven A. Schwartz had used ChatGPT’s AI program for the legal research. Judge Castel will make a ruling to determine potential repercussions. This case raises the question- are robots ready to replace human knowledge workers?
U.S lawyer Stephen Schwartz finds himself in a difficult situation due to court case against his legal team's reliance on AI chatbot, ChatGPT for legal research. His firm faces a hearing over potentially inaccurate information. AI's applications for legal research still need thorough examination, yet it serves as a reminder to verify anything put forward.
Two lawyers face a court hearing for using ChatGPT, an AI-based tool, in legal research. Peter LoDuca and Steven A Schwartz's firm reportedly used the tool, unaware of its inaccuracies. Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, the company behind ChatGPT, provides the best legal advice and representation. Verify accuracy of AI tools to ensure reliable representation.
Avianca Inc. is the oldest airline in the world and was recently at the centre of a case involving AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT. Management lawyers used ChatGPT to generate legal briefs but found that it had provided false information. Lawyers must carefully verify whatever information ChatGPT provides, raising questions about the value and dangers of using AI in such cases. Manhattan federal judge P. Kevin Castel ordered a hearing to consider potential sanctions.
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?