Tag: Legal Research

Lawyer Steven Schwartz from New York's Levidow, Levidow, and Oberman recently admitted to using AI software, ChatGPT, for legal research, after it made reference to fabricated court cases. Schwartz is representing Roberto Mata in his lawsuit against Avianca Airlines for injuries he suffered during a flight from El Salvador to JFK in 2019. He and his team are making a case for why the lawsuit should not be dismissed. Get all updates with this tech-fueled legal case from a trusted source.

Two lawyers face a court hearing for using ChatGPT, an AI-based tool, in legal research. Peter LoDuca and Steven A Schwartz's firm reportedly used the tool, unaware of its inaccuracies. Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, the company behind ChatGPT, provides the best legal advice and representation. Verify accuracy of AI tools to ensure reliable representation.

Attorney Steven Schwartz recently faced an unexpected legal predicament when the court cases he had submitted were found to be untrue. Avianca Airlines had sued him for negligence, due to his lack of verification of the content from ChatGPT, an AI-powered legal research chatbot. Schwartz now faces a sanctions hearing for utilizing generative artificial intelligence without confirming its accuracy. Reminding users to be extra careful and verify legal research from reputable databases, this case serves as a cautionary tale.

Lawyer Mr. LoDuca and his firm LoDuca and Associates recently had their filing come under scrutiny due to non-existent case citations. Court issued orders to the plaintiff's counsel for an affidavit and when it turned out ChatGPT, an AI website, had supplied bogus legal decisions, the firm vowed to never use it for research without verifying. Court ordered them for showing cause why they should not be sanctioned.

As AI technology advances, legal professionals must contemplate ethical considerations when implementing tools like ChatGPT and Bard, two great deep learning language models providing summaries and explanations. Understand risk, relevance, and efficacy of the technology for responsible use: accuracy and quality of generated output; transparency of consumer data and potential for unintentional harm caused by AI must all be considered.