A New York lawyer used an AI tool to draft a legal affidavit that contained fake court cases. Judge P. Kevin Castel questioned how Steven Schwartz had missed the fabricated cases, calling the AI tool's output legal gibberish. This serves as a reminder of the importance of exercising due diligence, critical thinking, and maintaining a human element in the legal process. The incident serves as a cautionary tale for legal professionals, emphasizing the need to double-check research for accuracy and authenticity.
New York lawyer apologizes for using OpenAI's chatbot, ChatGPT, to generate fictitious content for a lawsuit against Avianca. The false court precedents brought ridicule to his office and misled the court, unknowingly.
A lawyer got tricked by an AI tool while using fabricated legal cases in court. ChatGPT created bogus judicial decisions with quoted text. A judge questioned how he missed it, calling it legal gibberish while the hearing went undecided.
A New York lawyer is in trouble after relying on ChatGPT for research, leading to fabricated court cases in a brief. His hearing didn't go well, with the judge questioning the AI-generated case. The lawyer stated he had no idea the chatbot was capable of fabricating citations. This embarrassing incident is a cautionary tale about relying too much on technology for legal research.
A New York lawyer in hot water after being accused of filing a document with fake judicial opinions & quotes. He claimed that a legal research program called ChatGPT was to blame. The lawyer misunderstood that it was an AI program that could fabricate citations. Sanctions pending.
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?