Lawyer Zachariah Crabill avoided a legal nightmare caused by AI legal research, as Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca filed phony cases using ChatGPT. It's important for attorneys to double-check AI-generated research to avoid malpractice in court. AI can save time but also lead to disastrous consequences if not used wisely.
Learn how two lawyers used a legal research tool to generate fake cases, only to blame the tool when caught. The hearing showed their lack of diligence and competence, emphasizing the value of attention to detail in the legal profession. Will the case be dismissed? Find out now.
Two lawyers in Manhattan federal court may face punishment after using an AI-powered chatbot called ChatGPT to support a case against Avianca Airlines. However, the chatbot produced fictitious legal research, causing concern among experts about the potential risks of AI. Microsoft invested $1bn in OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT. The judge is yet to decide on sanctions.
Lawyers cite fictitious legal research in a court filing & face repercussions. They used an AI-powered chatbot to find proofs but unknowingly cited fake cases. Avianca & court exposed bogus case laws. Judge confronted the lawyers. SEO optimized article with 152 characters.
Personal injury lawyers reprimanded by a New York judge for using an AI-powered search engine to populate a legal brief with completely fake cases. A defendant warns of ethical dangers. Action against Steven Schwartz will be determined by the judge.
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?