Tag: Fabricated cases

A New York attorney utilized an AI tool called ChatGPT to research cases for his client, but now faces potential sanctions for citing six fabricated cases, including one that never existed. Although the tool generated fraudulent citations, the attorney did not confirm the validity of the cases independently, and may have his license revoked or face financial penalties. This cautionary tale shows the dangers of solely relying on technology and not verifying information.

A lawyer got tricked by an AI tool while using fabricated legal cases in court. ChatGPT created bogus judicial decisions with quoted text. A judge questioned how he missed it, calling it legal gibberish while the hearing went undecided.

A New York lawyer apologizes for submitting fabricated court documents using AI-generated cases and rulings from ChatGPT. The lawyer stated the false citations supported why a case against Avianca airline should proceed. This regrettable mistake was his first time using AI for legal research.

This article details the bold decision of an attorney to rely on an AI called ChatGPT to fabricate details in a legal case. The move goes to show the potential of AI in the legal world and its implications for attorneys. PfRC, the Public Funding Resource Center, continues to advocate for those who need legal assistance and advice.

Avianca - the second-largest airline in South America - is facing an investigation by Judge Kevin Castel for submitting fabricated court documents to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Judge Castel has been appointed by presidents of both parties and has an extensive record of handling important international cases. Learn more about the investigation and Avianca's history.