US lawyer apologizes for a false brief submitted to a civil case involving Avianca that was generated by a chatbot. Steven Schwartz cited non-existent cases to support his litigation claim, blaming his first-time use of ChatGPT. Read more on this story.
Lawyer apologizes for using fabricated legal cases generated by AI-powered chatbot in lawsuit against airline. The incident raises concerns about the ethical considerations of using AI in the legal industry. Repercussions are yet to be determined.
New York lawyer apologizes for using OpenAI's chatbot, ChatGPT, to generate fictitious content for a lawsuit against Avianca. The false court precedents brought ridicule to his office and misled the court, unknowingly.
Lawyers cite fictitious legal research in a court filing & face repercussions. They used an AI-powered chatbot to find proofs but unknowingly cited fake cases. Avianca & court exposed bogus case laws. Judge confronted the lawyers. SEO optimized article with 152 characters.
A New York lawyer apologizes for submitting fabricated court documents using AI-generated cases and rulings from ChatGPT. The lawyer stated the false citations supported why a case against Avianca airline should proceed. This regrettable mistake was his first time using AI for legal research.
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?