A recent study conducted in Australia has shed light on how university students are approaching the use of AI-based technology in their studies. The study, which surveyed 78 students and 32 academics from all states and territories, found that almost half of all respondents had not yet tried or used generative AI. Of this group, 85% did not intend to use the technology at university this year. The research suggests that students may be concerned that its use will be viewed as cheating. The students surveyed who do use the technology described it as a helpful launch pad that can provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. However, confusion remains among students about how the technology can and should be used, with only 46% agreeing that generative AI should be allowed for assessment purposes. The study will continue to monitor how students and academics use generative AI as we move into the second semester, and the authors have invited further contributions to their survey.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
What was the main focus of the recent study conducted in Australia?
The main focus of the study was to investigate how university students are approaching the use of AI-based technology in their studies.
How many students and academics were surveyed in the study?
The study surveyed 78 students and 32 academics from all states and territories.
What was the percentage of students who had not yet tried or used generative AI?
Almost half of all respondents had not yet tried or used generative AI, according to the study.
Why did students express reluctance to use generative AI technology?
The research suggests that students may be concerned that its use will be viewed as cheating.
How did the students who use generative AI technology describe its usefulness?
The students surveyed who do use the technology described it as a helpful launch pad that can provide feedback and suggestions for improvement.
Do students have clear understanding of how generative AI technology should be used?
Confusion remains among students about how the technology can and should be used, according to the study.
What percentage of students agreed that generative AI should be allowed for assessment purposes?
Only 46% of students agreed that generative AI should be allowed for assessment purposes.
Will the study continue to monitor generative AI usage among students and academics?
Yes, the study will continue to monitor how students and academics use generative AI as we move into the second semester.
Are further contributions to the survey invited by the authors?
Yes, the authors of the study have invited further contributions to their survey.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.