Lawyers Penalized for Filing False Cases Based on ChatGPT Research

Date:

A US judge has imposed hefty fines and other sanctions on a law firm and two lawyers for filing court papers filled with fabricated legal cases. The lawyers, Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, heavily relied on artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT for their legal research. The court ordered the duo and their firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman to pay a sum of $5,000 and inform their client and judges falsely linked to the corruption. In a federal court ruling, US District Judge P Kevin Castel noted that while it’s not illegal to use AI in legal research, lawyers remain responsible for ensuring the accuracy of their litigation filings to the court. The judge criticized the lawyers for not disclosing their mistake when opposing counsel claimed the cases were non-existent. Moreover, the lawyers continued to cling to their falsehood even after judicial orders raised doubts about their arguments.

See also  No. 10 Clarifies: Ordinary Britons Won't be Called Up for Future Wars

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the recent news about lawyers being penalized?

Two lawyers and their law firm, Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, have been fined and sanctioned for filing fabricated legal cases.

What did the lawyers use for their legal research?

The lawyers heavily relied on an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot called ChatGPT.

What penalty did the court impose on the lawyers and their firm?

The court ordered the lawyers and their firm to pay a sum of $5,000 and inform their client and judges falsely linked to the corruption.

Is it legal to use AI in legal research?

Yes, it is legal to use AI in legal research.

Who is responsible for ensuring the accuracy of litigation filings to the court?

Lawyers are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of litigation filings to the court.

What did the judge criticize the lawyers for?

The judge criticized the lawyers for not disclosing their mistake when opposing counsel claimed the cases were non-existent and for continuing to cling to their falsehood even after judicial orders raised doubts about their arguments.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Aniket Patel
Aniket Patel
Aniket is a skilled writer at ChatGPT Global News, contributing to the ChatGPT News category. With a passion for exploring the diverse applications of ChatGPT, Aniket brings informative and engaging content to our readers. His articles cover a wide range of topics, showcasing the versatility and impact of ChatGPT in various domains.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy Leverages AI for Rapid Ad Growth and Consumer Insights

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy harnesses AI for rapid ad growth and consumer insights, driving innovation and success in a competitive market.

China Condemns AUKUS Pact, Warns of Nuclear Proliferation

China condemns AUKUS pact, warns of nuclear proliferation in South Pacific. Foreign Minister Wang Yi criticizes Western powers for escalating tensions.

Netflix Accused of Using AI-Generated Images in True Crime Documentary What Jennifer Did

Discover the controversy surrounding Netflix's documentary What Jennifer Did and the potential use of AI-generated images in true crime storytelling.

China Warns Western Powers in AUKUS Pact, Risks Nuclear Tensions

China's Foreign Minister warns AUKUS of nuclear proliferation risks in the South Pacific, urging diplomacy and respect for sovereignty.