Lawyers Fined $5K for Falling for OpenAI’s ChatGPT’s Legal Research Prank

Date:

Two New York lawyers have been fined $5,000 for unknowingly using fictitious case citations generated by OpenAI’s chatGPT in their legal brief. Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, partners at Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, were accused of acting in bad faith and creating false and misleading statements to the court. The judge acknowledged that using AI for legal assistance is not inherently improper but emphasised that attorneys must serve as gatekeepers and ensure the accuracy and reliability of their filings. Generative AI models, including OpenAI’s chatGPT, Microsoft’s Bing AI and Google’s Bard, have been known to generate false information with confidence, a phenomenon referred to as hallucinations. Instances of AI models producing false information have raised concerns, especially in fields like law and medicine.

See also  OpenAI Launches AI Chatbot ChatGPT on Android, Expanding Availability, United States (US)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

Who were the lawyers fined for using OpenAI's chatGPT in their legal brief?

Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, partners at Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, were fined $5,000 for using fictitious case citations generated by OpenAI's chatGPT in their legal brief.

What were the lawyers accused of?

The lawyers were accused of acting in bad faith and creating false and misleading statements to the court.

Is using AI for legal assistance prohibited?

No, using AI for legal assistance is not inherently improper.

What did the judge emphasize in the case?

The judge emphasized that attorneys must serve as gatekeepers and ensure the accuracy and reliability of their filings.

What is the phenomenon referred to as when AI models generate false information with confidence?

The phenomenon is referred to as hallucinations.

What are some other examples of generative AI models besides OpenAI's chatGPT?

Other examples of generative AI models include Microsoft's Bing AI and Google's Bard.

Why are instances of AI models producing false information concerning in fields like law and medicine?

Instances of AI models producing false information raise concerns because of the potential consequences and impact on important decisions in fields like law and medicine.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Aniket Patel
Aniket Patel
Aniket is a skilled writer at ChatGPT Global News, contributing to the ChatGPT News category. With a passion for exploring the diverse applications of ChatGPT, Aniket brings informative and engaging content to our readers. His articles cover a wide range of topics, showcasing the versatility and impact of ChatGPT in various domains.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

WooCommerce Revolutionizes E-Commerce Trends Worldwide

Discover how WooCommerce is reshaping global e-commerce trends and revolutionizing online shopping experiences worldwide.

Revolutionizing Liquid Formulations: ML Training Dataset Unveiled

Discover how researchers are revolutionizing liquid formulations with ML technology and an open dataset for faster, more sustainable product design.

Google’s AI Emissions Crisis: Can Technology Save the Planet by 2030?

Explore Google's AI emissions crisis and the potential of technology to save the planet by 2030 amid growing environmental concerns.

OpenAI’s Unsandboxed ChatGPT App Raises Privacy Concerns

OpenAI's ChatGPT app for macOS lacks sandboxing, raising privacy concerns due to stored chats in plain text. Protect your data by using trusted sources.