Two lawyers have been fined $5,000 for submitting a brief in an airline injury case that featured made-up legal precedents generated by an AI chatbot called ChatGPT. Steven A Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, working for New York-based firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, stood by their submission even after it was highlighted as fake by opposing counsel. Both eventually apologised to the court. Judge Kevin Castel said in his sanction order that AI had potential uses in the legal industry, however, good lawyers appropriately obtain assistance from junior lawyers, law students, contract lawyers, legal encyclopedias and databases such as Westlaw and LexisNexis.Â
Lawyers Fined $5,000 for Submitting ChatGPT Hallucinations in Court
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
OpenAI Faces Security Concerns with Mac ChatGPT App & Internal Data Breach
OpenAI faces security concerns with Mac ChatGPT app and internal data breach, highlighting the need for robust cybersecurity measures.
Former US Marine in Moscow Orchestrates Deepfake Disinformation Campaign
Former US Marine orchestrates deepfake disinformation campaign from Moscow. Uncover the truth behind AI-generated fake news now.
Kashmiri Student Achieves AI Milestone at Top Global Conference
Kashmiri student achieves AI milestone at top global conference, graduating from world's first AI research university. Join him on his journey!
Bittensor Network Hit by $8M Token Theft Amid Rising Crypto Hacks and Exploits
Bittensor Network faces $8M token theft in latest cyber attack. Learn how crypto hacks are evolving in the industry.