Two lawyers who used an AI chatbot to generate false cases in order to win a lawsuit have appeared before US District Judge Kevin Castel to explain why they ought not to be sanctioned. The case has caused amusement, not least due to the fact that the chatbot in question was the OpenAI product ChatGPT. The lawyers involved, Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, submitted a “good faith workaround” using the AI tool as Westlaw and LexisNexis were not available to them. They claimed that the legal mistakes made were inadvertent and so sought an absence of sanctions. However, it is unclear if Schwartz will be punished for ChatGPT’s production of extended excerpts and favourable quotations from fake cases.
Lawyers confess to fabricating cases with ChatGPT, beg court for mercy
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Samsung Unpacked Event Teases Exciting AI Features for Galaxy Z Fold 6 and More
Discover the latest AI features for Galaxy Z Fold 6 and more at Samsung's Unpacked event on July 10. Stay tuned for exciting updates!
Revolutionizing Ophthalmology: Quantum Computing’s Impact on Eye Health
Explore how quantum computing is changing ophthalmology with faster information processing and better treatment options.
Are You Missing Out on Nvidia? You May Already Be a Millionaire!
Don't miss out on Nvidia's AI stock potential - could turn $25,000 into $1 million! Dive into tech investments for huge returns!
Revolutionizing Business Growth Through AI & Machine Learning
Revolutionize your business growth with AI & Machine Learning. Learn six ways to use ML in your startup and drive success.