Two lawyers who used an AI chatbot to generate false cases in order to win a lawsuit have appeared before US District Judge Kevin Castel to explain why they ought not to be sanctioned. The case has caused amusement, not least due to the fact that the chatbot in question was the OpenAI product ChatGPT. The lawyers involved, Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, submitted a “good faith workaround” using the AI tool as Westlaw and LexisNexis were not available to them. They claimed that the legal mistakes made were inadvertent and so sought an absence of sanctions. However, it is unclear if Schwartz will be punished for ChatGPT’s production of extended excerpts and favourable quotations from fake cases.
Lawyers confess to fabricating cases with ChatGPT, beg court for mercy
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.
The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031
Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.