Law firm fined $5,000 for fake case references in court brief written with ChatGPT

Date:

A New York law firm has been slapped with a $5,000 fine after one of its attorneys used OpenAI’s artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, to write a court brief littered with false case references. The legal action was filed on behalf of a passenger who said he was harmed during an Avianca flight by a metal serving cart. Court filings revealed that the attorney Steven Schwartz fed ChatGPT prompts to help bolster his research, but the prompts resulted in fake cases. The judge in the case criticized Schwartz for not coming clean about his use of the AI tool soon enough and ordered his law firm to send letters to each judge falsely identified as an author of one of the fake opinions.

See also  Sequoia Capital splits into three entities, resolving power struggle suspicions.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the name of the AI chatbot used by the attorney in the law firm?

The AI chatbot used by the attorney in the law firm is called ChatGPT, which is developed by OpenAI.

How much fine did the law firm receive for using fake case references in their court brief?

The law firm was fined $5,000 for using fake case references in their court brief.

The court brief was filed on behalf of whom?

The court brief was filed on behalf of a passenger who claimed he was harmed during an Avianca flight by a metal serving cart.

How did the attorney use the AI tool to bolster his research?

The attorney fed prompts to the AI tool to help bolster his research, which resulted in the creation of fake cases in the court brief.

Why did the judge criticize the attorney in the case?

The judge criticized the attorney in the case for not coming clean about his use of the AI tool soon enough, which resulted in fake cases being presented in the court brief.

What action did the judge order the law firm to take?

The judge ordered the law firm to send letters to each judge who was falsely identified as an author of one of the fake opinions presented in the court brief.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Advait Gupta
Advait Gupta
Advait is our expert writer and manager for the Artificial Intelligence category. His passion for AI research and its advancements drives him to deliver in-depth articles that explore the frontiers of this rapidly evolving field. Advait's articles delve into the latest breakthroughs, trends, and ethical considerations, keeping readers at the forefront of AI knowledge.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.