Trustworthy AI relies on transparency logs and model lineage records for security and trust.
AI-driven software and machine learning models have become integral to modern technology, but their rapid proliferation also brings new cybersecurity challenges. As attackers increasingly target vulnerabilities within AI software packages, organizations must adopt stringent security measures to protect their AI artifacts and systems. This article explores the evolving landscape of AI security and outlines the strategies needed to fortify the defenses.
In the age of AI, attackers are drawn to the low-hanging fruit, exploiting opportunities created by the proliferation of AI software packages and Language Model Models (LLMs). One of the insidious methods they employ is typosquatting, a tactic that mimics AI images and software packages. This technique results in a ‘Denial-of-Service’ (DoS) for developers who must sift through a deluge of counterfeit artifacts, leading to a substantial waste of resources and time.
To combat these Sybil-style attacks on AI artifacts, developers must prioritize authenticity. One way to achieve this is through verified processes such as signed commits and packages. Trustworthy sources and vendors should be the primary channels for obtaining open-source artifacts. This approach serves as a long-term prevention mechanism, making it significantly more challenging for attackers to infiltrate and compromise AI software repositories.
As AI evolves, attackers leverage it to create more convincing typo-squatting repositories and automate the expansion of fake AI software artifacts. Simultaneously, developers harness AI to scale the discovery of security vulnerabilities and Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs).
However, this double-edged sword poses a challenge. AI often detects poorly vetted CVEs, inundating security teams and creating a ‘noisy pager’ syndrome, where distinguishing legitimate vulnerabilities from noise becomes arduous.
Amidst the signal vs. noise problem, a pivotal shift is underway in AI security. Adopting hardened, minimal container images is poised to reduce the volume of exploitable packages.
This transformation makes it easier for security teams to safeguard their turf and for developer teams to build AI-driven software with security at its core. Clean base images are becoming fundamental AI security hygiene, a necessity from recent exploits like PoisonGPT, which exposed vulnerabilities in popular AI frameworks.
When developers install a base image, they entrust the source and the security of its dependencies. This heightened scrutiny has focused on eliminating extraneous dependencies, ensuring images contain only the desired AI libraries and functionality. This practice, rooted in AI security hygiene, eliminates recursive dependencies that could be exploited to gain unauthorized access to massive datasets crucial for AI model training.
The quest for trustworthiness in AI systems extends beyond container images. Cryptographic signatures, trusted computing, and AI systems running on secure hardware enhance security transparency. The end game, however, involves developers being able to track AI models through transparency logs — immutable records that provide a chain of custody, including details about the training model, its creators, the training process, and access history.
Looking ahead to 2024, a significant shift is on the horizon. Language Model Models (LLMs) will increasingly be selected based on their trustworthiness, and verifiable provenance records will become the cornerstone of trust mechanisms. These records will clearly depict an AI model’s history and lineage, ensuring that organizations can confidently rely on their AI systems.
