Conservationists Call for Permanent Solution to Prevent Elephant-Train Collisions

Date:

Title: Conservationists Stress the Need for a Long-Term Solution to Prevent Elephant-Train Collisions

Wildlife conservationists have recently appealed to the forest department, urging them to address the issue of train collisions with elephants by implementing a permanent solution rather than relying on temporary measures. While the introduction of an underpass seems promising for safely facilitating elephant crossings, experts highlight that it should not be viewed as an ultimate resolution to mitigate conflicts. Conservationists suggest an alternative approach, advocating for abandoning the vulnerable ‘B’ line track that traverses through forested areas and instead constructing a new track outside the buffer zone to prevent future conflicts.

J Sathish, the director of Kongu Global Forum, emphasizes the importance of avoiding ad-hoc solutions and states, Our suggestion is that most of the vulnerable ‘B’ line track should be entirely abandoned as it runs through the forest area. Instead, a new track should be laid outside the buffer zone to prevent any conflicts.

In contrast to adopting advanced technologies such as AI-powered warning systems, environmentalist K Mohanraj believes that real-time solutions such as acquiring elephant corridors and developing trenches should be prioritized. He notes, Only time will reveal whether the project will be a success or failure. The elephants would have already become accustomed to using other areas, making it unnecessary for them to rely on the newly constructed underpass. Furthermore, redirecting elephants to the underpass may pose risks, as the animals could become agitated and potentially trigger conflicts.

The conservationists’ call for a permanent solution stems from their objective to establish a harmonious coexistence between trains and elephants. By abandoning the ‘B’ line track running through forested regions and constructing an alternative route outside the buffer zone, the potential for conflicts can be substantially reduced. Simultaneously, acquiring elephant corridors and developing trenches can provide additional safe passage options for elephants and help enforce their natural movements. Striking a balanced approach, which takes into account the welfare of both elephants and humans, is crucial in finding a successful long-term resolution to prevent tragic collisions.

See also  Receiving Advice on Machine Learning for Conservation from a Caltech Expert

In conclusion, conservationists are urging the forest department to prioritize the implementation of a permanent solution to prevent elephant-train collisions. While acknowledging the effectiveness of the newly built underpass in facilitating elephant crossings, experts stress that it should not be considered a total solution. By abandoning the vulnerable track through the forest area and constructing an alternative route, as well as acquiring elephant corridors and developing trenches, both elephants and trains can coexist safely without any unnecessary conflicts. It is essential to prioritize the overall well-being of wildlife and society, and only time will determine the effectiveness of these proposed measures.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the issue that conservationists are addressing regarding elephant-train collisions?

Conservationists are calling for a long-term solution to prevent elephant-train collisions.

What is the suggested alternative approach by conservationists?

Conservationists suggest abandoning the vulnerable track through the forest area and constructing a new track outside the buffer zone to prevent conflicts.

What real-time solutions are environmentalists emphasizing?

Environmentalists prioritize acquiring elephant corridors and developing trenches as real-time solutions to prevent conflicts.

Why do conservationists believe the newly built underpass is not a total solution?

Conservationists believe that elephants may not use the newly constructed underpass as they may have already become accustomed to using alternative areas, potentially triggering conflicts.

What is the overall objective of conservationists in addressing this issue?

The objective is to establish a harmonious coexistence between trains and elephants, prioritizing the welfare of both parties.

How can conflicts be substantially reduced according to conservationists?

Conflicts can be reduced by abandoning the vulnerable track through the forest area, constructing an alternative route, and acquiring elephant corridors while developing trenches.

What will determine the effectiveness of these proposed measures?

Only time will determine the effectiveness of the proposed measures in preventing elephant-train collisions.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Samsung’s Foldable Phones: The Future of Smartphone Screens

Discover how Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 6 is leading the way with innovative software & dual-screen design for the future of smartphones.

Unlocking Franchise Success: Leveraging Cognitive Biases in Sales

Unlock franchise success by leveraging cognitive biases in sales. Use psychology to craft compelling narratives and drive successful deals.

Wiz Walks Away from $23B Google Deal, Pursues IPO Instead

Wiz Walks away from $23B Google Deal in favor of pursuing IPO. Investors gear up for trading with updates on market performance and key developments.

Southern Punjab Secretariat Leads Pakistan in AI Adoption, Prominent Figures Attend Demo

Experience how South Punjab Secretariat leads Pakistan in AI adoption with a demo attended by prominent figures. Learn about their groundbreaking initiative.