Comedian Sarah Silverman sues Meta and OpenAI over use of her works to power AI

Date:

Renowned comedian Sarah Silverman, along with authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden, have taken legal action against Meta and OpenAI for allegedly infringing their copyrights. The lawsuit, filed in a federal court in San Francisco, accuses the companies of using the content from their books without permission to train artificial intelligence language models. This development comes as creators of large language models face lawsuits for utilizing copyrighted material to enhance user experience.

The lawsuit against Meta claims that leaked information about the company’s AI business reveals unauthorized use of copyrighted material. On the other hand, the lawsuit against OpenAI alleges that the summaries produced by the ChatGPT chatbot indicate that the bot was trained using copyrighted content from the plaintiffs. Although these summaries may contain some errors, they suggest that ChatGPT has access to specific details from the copyrighted works, a fact that the artists argue demonstrates infringement.

The lawsuit against Meta asserts that the authors’ books were included in the data sets Meta used to train its LLaMA models. However, it claims that this data was sourced illicitly. Meta’s LLaMA model relies on various data sets, including ThePile, which the complaint alleges contains content copied from the Bibliotik private tracker. The lawsuit describes Bibliotik as one of the well-known shadow libraries that engage in blatantly illegal activities.

Last week, OpenAI faced two additional lawsuits. One was filed by authors Paul Tremblay and Mona Awad, while the other was a class action lawsuit accusing ChatGPT and Dall-e of violating the privacy and copyright of millions of internet users.

See also  OpenAI partners with Axel Springer to integrate real-time news into ChatGPT, Germany

These legal actions highlight the growing concern among content creators regarding the unauthorized use of their copyrighted works by artificial intelligence platforms. The plaintiffs in these cases are seeking compensation for the alleged infringement of their copyrights.

Overall, this marks a significant moment as language model creators face early lawsuits over the unauthorized incorporation of copyrighted material. The outcome of these lawsuits will undoubtedly shape how AI platforms utilize copyrighted content in the future, as the demand for realistic AI responses continues to grow.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

Who is suing Meta and OpenAI?

Renowned comedian Sarah Silverman, along with authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden, are suing Meta and OpenAI.

What are they accusing these companies of?

The plaintiffs are accusing Meta and OpenAI of infringing their copyrights by using their works without permission to train AI language models.

Where was the lawsuit filed?

The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in San Francisco.

What evidence do the plaintiffs have?

The lawsuit against Meta claims that leaked information about the company's AI business indicates unauthorized use of copyrighted material. The lawsuit against OpenAI points to summaries generated by the ChatGPT chatbot that suggest copyrighted content was used in its training.

How does the lawsuit against Meta describe the source of the copyrighted material?

The lawsuit alleges that Meta used data sets that contain content copied from the Bibliotik private tracker, described as one of the well-known shadow libraries engaged in illegal activities.

Have there been any other lawsuits against OpenAI recently?

Yes, OpenAI has faced two additional lawsuits. One was filed by authors Paul Tremblay and Mona Awad, while the other is a class action lawsuit accusing ChatGPT and Dall-e of violating privacy and copyright rights of internet users.

What is the main concern of content creators in these cases?

Content creators are concerned about the unauthorized use of their copyrighted works by AI platforms and are seeking compensation for the alleged infringement.

How might these lawsuits impact the use of copyrighted content by AI platforms in the future?

The outcome of these lawsuits will likely shape how AI platforms utilize copyrighted content. It will be significant in determining the boundaries and requirements for using copyrighted material in training AI systems.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Aryan Sharma
Aryan Sharma
Aryan is our dedicated writer and manager for the OpenAI category. With a deep passion for artificial intelligence and its transformative potential, Aryan brings a wealth of knowledge and insights to his articles. With a knack for breaking down complex concepts into easily digestible content, he keeps our readers informed and engaged.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.