ChatGPT has recently warned local journalists that machines could eventually take the place of human reporters. The warning was issued by the artificial intelligence tool when it wrote an article for the Falmouth Packet’s regular ‘Skipper’ column. ChatGPT pointed out that AI itself is not a threat to local journalism. However, it criticized corporations using AI to automate the production of news, as they are only motivated by maximizing profits, not providing quality journalism.
Humans are still better than AI when it comes to producing high-quality, creative and innovative content. As such, local journalists have to find new and creative ways to engage with their audiences and provide content that cannot be found elsewhere. If they can rise to the challenge, then their positions in the age of AI will remain safe.
Emma Ferguson is the head of content at the Packet. She discussed ChatGPT’s column and pointed out that AI can save journalists time when it comes to summarizing news pieces or drafting press releases and social media posts. That said, AI can also be used to generate fake news, hence the importance of journalists doing their own research. Emma also highlighted the advantages of journalists going on-site to investigate matters and highlighting key points that cannot be found via digital sources.
In conclusion, ChatGPT’s warning that local journalists could be “replaced by machines” is a good reminder of the importance of quality content. Journalists will have to find new ways to connect with their readers and create content that cannot be easily replaced by machines. It is only through this effort that local journalism can stay relevant and make an impact in the midst of AI’s proliferation.
