The recent news about a law firm being penalized after using ChatGPT, a generative AI application for legal research assistance, has sparked a lot of discussion about the ethics and professionalism of utilizing AI in the legal industry. However, the blame should not fall on the AI application itself, but rather on the lawyer who failed to thoroughly review and check the citations provided by the tool. As with any research tool, lawyers must exercise due diligence and critical thinking skills to verify the accuracy and relevance of the information prior to using it in legal filings. While AI can certainly improve the efficiency and accuracy of legal research, it should not be used as a replacement for human judgment and expertise.
Levidow, Levidow & Oberman is the law firm involved in the recent case where sanctions were imposed due to the use of ChatGPT in their filings. The attorneys specifically named in the case were Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz.
Steps:
N/A
