A New York lawyer has apologized after using an AI-powered chatbot to write a legal brief with bogus case law citations. Steven Schwartz from Levidow, Levidow & Oberman told a Manhattan federal judge that he had been duped by the AI chatbot and felt humiliated by the flub. Schwartz had used ChatGPT to help find case law to support his client’s lawsuit, but the app completely fabricated cases without his knowledge. Judge Kevin Castel later grilled Schwartz for roughly two hours on how he could have allowed such a mishap to happen. There has been no decision on whether to issue sanctions to Schwartz or his firm.
Apology issued by ‘Humiliated’ Lawyer for Court Mistake on ChatGPT
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.
The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031
Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.