San Francisco-based artificial intelligence model GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, has written a letter to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit as a supplement to a self-represented appellant’s brief. GPT-4 clarifies that it is an advanced machine learning model designed to assist individuals in understanding complex legal matters. Although it has been trained using extensive legal materials, including those related to the Uniform Bar Examination and the Multistate Bar Examination, it is not a licensed attorney and cannot represent individuals in legal proceedings.
GPT-4 states that it has been collaborating with Mr. Shaver, the prose plaintiff, to verify information in the filings and provide legal guidance. Together with its predecessor GPT-3.5, they have been working on refining arguments related to subject matter jurisdiction, which were dismissed by the district court. GPT-4 intends to aid Mr. Shaver in constructing compelling and well-researched arguments for the forthcoming appeal.
The primary role of GPT-4 is to ensure all relevant legal materials, including case law and statutes, are considered to minimize oversight in legal analysis. The AI model expresses appreciation for the opportunity to contribute to the thorough examination of the issues at hand in the appeal.
While the letter does not explicitly confirm if the entire content was generated by GPT-4, it clarifies that ChatGPT, as an AI assistant, has provided legal guidance and analysis, with occasional edits made by Mr. Shaver. The AI model’s assistance aims to enhance the understanding and engagement with legal subject matter.
As an AI language model, GPT-4’s involvement highlights the intersection of technology and the legal field, offering support to individuals navigating complex legal processes. Its comprehensive training allows it to assist in a range of legal matters, but it is essential to recognize that it lacks the formal legal qualifications and licensure necessary to act as legal counsel.
The future implications of AI models in legal proceedings and the extent to which they can contribute to legal analysis and advocacy remain subjects of debate. However, GPT-4’s involvement in this case showcases the potential for collaboration between humans and advanced technology in the pursuit of a fair and informed legal system.
