China has introduced new draft security regulations aimed at companies offering generative artificial intelligence (AI) services. These regulations impose restrictions on the data sources used for training AI models. The draft regulations, released by the National Information Security Standardization Committee, highlight the need for a security evaluation of the content used to train publicly accessible generative AI models. Any content exceeding 5% in the form of unlawful and detrimental information will be blacklisted, including content related to terrorism, violence, subversion of the socialist system, harm to the country’s reputation, and actions that undermine national cohesion and societal stability.
In addition, the draft regulations emphasize that data subject to censorship on the Chinese internet should not be utilized as training material for these AI models. This follows a month after regulatory authorities granted permission to several Chinese tech companies, including Baidu, to introduce their generative AI-driven chatbots to the public.
The Cyber Administration of China (CAC) has been consistent in its requirement for companies to provide security evaluations before launching generative AI-powered services. The recent draft security stipulations specify that organizations must obtain explicit consent from individuals whose personal data, including biometric information, is used for training these AI models. The guidelines also address the prevention of intellectual property infringements.
Globally, governments are grappling with the establishment of regulatory frameworks for AI technology. China sees AI as a domain in which it aims to compete with the United States, with aspirations of becoming a global leader in the field by 2030. By imposing these regulations, China seeks to ensure the responsible and secure deployment of generative AI services.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
What are the new draft security regulations introduced by China?
The new draft security regulations aim to regulate companies offering generative artificial intelligence services. These regulations impose restrictions on the data sources used for training AI models and require a security evaluation of the content used.
What types of content will be blacklisted under these regulations?
Content related to terrorism, violence, subversion of the socialist system, harm to the country's reputation, and actions that undermine national cohesion and societal stability will be blacklisted if they exceed 5% of the training material for AI models.
Can data subject to censorship on the Chinese internet be used to train these AI models?
No, the draft regulations emphasize that data subject to censorship on the Chinese internet should not be utilized as training material for generative AI models.
What permission did Chinese tech companies receive before introducing their generative AI-driven chatbots to the public?
Chinese tech companies, including Baidu, were granted permission by regulatory authorities to introduce their generative AI-driven chatbots to the public.
What requirements does the Cyber Administration of China have for companies launching generative AI-powered services?
The Cyber Administration of China requires companies to provide security evaluations before launching generative AI-powered services. The recent draft security regulations also specify the need for explicit consent from individuals whose personal data is used for training these AI models.
What is China's goal in imposing these regulations on generative AI services?
China sees AI as a domain where it aims to compete with the United States and become a global leader by 2030. By imposing these regulations, China seeks to ensure the responsible and secure deployment of generative AI services.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
