China Warns US of Economic Coercion in Response to Restrictions on Investments

Date:

China Warns US of Economic Coercion in Response to Restrictions on Investments

China has strongly criticized the United States for imposing restrictions on investments in Chinese entities, viewing it as an act of economic coercion. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Commerce have lodged formal complaints to the US government, asserting that China reserves the right to take countermeasures.

The restrictions were imposed through an executive order signed by US President Joe Biden on August 9. The order grants authority to the US treasury secretary to block or regulate investments in Chinese entities operating in three sectors: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and certain artificial intelligence systems.

China deems this move as economic coercion and hegemonic bullying, arguing that it violates the principles of market economy and fair competition. The Chinese Foreign Ministry has called on the US to honor President Biden’s promise of avoiding decoupling from China and obstructing its economic development.

The Ministry of Commerce has urged the US to respect the laws of the market economy, ensure fair competition, and avoid hindering global economic and trade exchanges. They also emphasized the importance of not setting obstacles to the recovery and growth of the world economy.

The Chinese embassy in Washington expressed concerns that these investment restrictions would significantly impact the interests of both Chinese and American companies and investors. They warned that such measures could disrupt normal business cooperation between the two countries and erode international confidence in the US business environment.

Industry leaders in the US are also apprehensive about the potential consequences of restricting the sale of semiconductors to China. Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger raised concerns that without orders from Chinese customers, projects like Intel’s planned factory complex in Ohio would be negatively affected. The factory, which is expected to be one of the world’s largest chipmaking sites, was announced in 2022 with a $20 billion investment.

See also  India, China, and UK Rise as Top Offshore Service Destinations, Driving Global Market Growth, United Kingdom (UK)

Gelsinger, along with executives from Nvidia and Qualcomm, advised the Biden administration to carefully consider the impact of export restrictions on the chip industry and suggested a pause before implementing any new measures.

China is a significant contributor to Intel’s annual revenue, accounting for 36 percent in 2021. Restricting exports to China could jeopardize the Biden administration’s goal of reshoring chip production to the US, as Chinese orders play a crucial role in funding research and development efforts of chip firms.

Similarly, more than 60 percent of Qualcomm’s revenue comes from the China region through the supply of components to smartphone manufacturers such as Xiaomi Corp. Chip-equipment makers like Applied Materials have already experienced a substantial reduction in revenue due to these restrictions.

The Semiconductor Industry Association warned that unilateral restrictions on semiconductors could undermine the competitiveness of the US semiconductor industry, disrupt supply chains, create market uncertainty, and lead to retaliatory actions from China.

The ongoing tensions surrounding investment restrictions highlight the complexities of the economic relationship between China and the US. Both countries must carefully navigate these challenges to avoid further escalation and ensure a stable global economic environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What restrictions did the United States impose on Chinese investments?

The United States imposed restrictions on investments in Chinese entities operating in three sectors: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and certain artificial intelligence systems. These restrictions were imposed through an executive order signed by President Joe Biden on August 9.

How has China responded to these restrictions?

China has strongly criticized the United States for imposing these restrictions, viewing it as an act of economic coercion. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Commerce have lodged formal complaints to the US government and asserted that China reserves the right to take countermeasures.

What does China argue regarding these restrictions?

China argues that these restrictions are a form of economic coercion and hegemonic bullying, violating the principles of market economy and fair competition. They have called on the US to honor President Biden's promise of avoiding decoupling from China and to not obstruct its economic development.

Why is the Chinese embassy in Washington concerned about these restrictions?

The Chinese embassy in Washington is concerned that these investment restrictions could significantly impact the interests of both Chinese and American companies and investors. They warn that such measures could disrupt normal business cooperation between the two countries and erode international confidence in the US business environment.

How are industry leaders in the US responding to these restrictions?

Industry leaders in the US, particularly in the semiconductor industry, have expressed apprehension about the potential consequences of restricting the sale of semiconductors to China. They are concerned about the negative impact on projects, such as Intel's planned factory complex in Ohio, as well as the overall competitiveness of the US semiconductor industry.

What impact could these restrictions have on the US chip industry?

These restrictions could jeopardize the Biden administration's goal of reshoring chip production to the US. Chinese orders play a crucial role in funding research and development efforts of chip firms, and restrictions on exports to China could hinder these efforts. Chip-equipment makers have already experienced revenue reductions, and the Semiconductor Industry Association warns of potential disruptions to supply chains, market uncertainty, and retaliatory actions from China.

What needs to be done to navigate the tensions surrounding investment restrictions?

Both China and the US must carefully navigate these challenges to avoid further escalation and ensure a stable global economic environment. It is important to consider the impact of these restrictions on industries and supply chains, engage in open dialogue, and seek mutually beneficial solutions that uphold principles of fair competition and market economy.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.