US Senators call for assessment of harm caused by Generative AI

Date:

US Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for a detailed technology assessment of generative artificial intelligence (AI), stating it carries serious harms. In a letter to the head of the Government Accountability Office, Markey and Peters cited risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information. The letter calls generative AI a double-edged sword and argues that Congress urgently needs non-partisan, technical expertise to understand the costs of the technology. Tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

See also  Trying Out Photoshop's AI Tool - Photos Made Creative, Funny, and Unreal

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is generative artificial intelligence (AI)?

Generative AI refers to technology that is capable of creating or generating new content, such as voice, text, or images, based on previously analyzed data.

Why have US Senators called for a technology assessment of generative AI?

Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for such an assessment because they believe generative AI carries serious harms, including risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information.

Can generative AI be both beneficial and harmful?

Yes, as referred to in the letter by Markey and Peters, generative AI is a double-edged sword, meaning that while it has the potential to benefit society, it can also cause harm if not properly regulated and overseen.

Why does Congress need non-partisan technical expertise to understand the costs of generative AI?

Congress needs non-partisan technical expertise in order to fully understand the potential negative consequences of generative AI, as well as the benefits, and make informed decisions on proper regulation and oversight.

Have concerns about generative AI been raised before?

Yes, tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Anaya Kapoor
Anaya Kapoor
Anaya is our dedicated writer and manager for the ChatGPT Latest News category. With her finger on the pulse of the AI community, Anaya keeps readers up to date with the latest developments, breakthroughs, and applications of ChatGPT. Her articles provide valuable insights into the rapidly evolving landscape of conversational AI.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Global Markets Await Fed Rate Cuts; Tokyo Hits 35-Year Highs

Global markets await Fed rate cuts as Tokyo hits 35-year highs. Asian stocks show mixed performances amid investor anticipation.

Sino-Tajik Relations Soar to New Heights Under Strategic Leadership

Discover how Sino-Tajik relations have reached unprecedented levels under strategic leadership, fostering mutual benefits for both nations.

Vietnam-South Korea Visit Yields $100B Trade Goal by 2025

Vietnam-South Korea visit aims for $100B trade goal by 2025. Leaders focus on cooperation in various areas for mutual growth.

Albanese Government Unveils Aged Care Digital Strategy for Better Senior Care

Albanese Government unveils Aged Care Digital Strategy to revolutionize senior care in Australia. Enhancing well-being through data and technology.