The Japanese education ministry has released draft guidelines that strongly discourages the use of chatbots, including ChatGPT, in any materials that could affect students’ grades such as tests, quizzes, and contests. The guidelines are expected to be distributed to all public and private elementary, junior high, and senior high schools. While chatbots may provide answers to any question a user poses, concerns have surfaced that students could abuse them. The guidelines indicate that generative artificial intelligence (AI) could initially be used in a limited capacity, such as preparing for group debates. However, the ministry plans to start trial use of generative AI in select schools to evaluate its positive and negative effects. The guidelines also caution against copyright infringement and harm to creativity and critical thinking. As a way to confirm student responses, the guidelines propose that students provide oral summaries after submissions. The education ministry clarifies that the guidelines are not intended to be hard rules on using generative AI technology.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
What are the draft guidelines released by the Japanese education ministry?
The Japanese education ministry has released draft guidelines that strongly discourage the use of chatbots, including ChatGPT, in any materials that could affect students’ grades such as tests, quizzes, and contests.
Where are these guidelines expected to be distributed?
The guidelines are expected to be distributed to all public and private elementary, junior high, and senior high schools.
Why are chatbots being discouraged in materials related to grades?
The concerns have surfaced that students could abuse chatbots to get answers to tests or quizzes.
Can generative AI be used in any capacity according to the guidelines?
Yes, generative AI could initially be used in a limited capacity, such as preparing for group debates.
How does the education ministry plan to evaluate the effects of generative AI in schools?
The ministry plans to start trial use of generative AI in select schools to evaluate its positive and negative effects.
What is the caution given against copyright infringement and harm to creativity and critical thinking?
The guidelines caution against copyright infringement and harm to creativity and critical thinking when using generative AI technology.
How does the education ministry propose to confirm student responses using generative AI?
As a way to confirm student responses, the guidelines propose that students provide oral summaries after submissions.
Are the guidelines intended to be hard rules on using generative AI technology?
No, the education ministry clarifies that the guidelines are not intended to be hard rules on using generative AI technology.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.