1 in 5 Players Targeted: FIFA’s Social Media Protection Tools Shield 117k Abusive Comments in Women’s World Cup

Date:

Title: Social Media Protection Tools Shield 117k Abusive Comments in Women’s World Cup, but Abuse Remains Prevalent

One in five players competing in the 2023 Women’s World Cup was targeted with online abuse, according to FIFA’s latest report. In an effort to combat this issue, FIFA introduced the Social Media Protection Service (SMPS), which successfully hid nearly 117,000 abusive comments during the tournament. However, the report also revealed that players at this year’s Women’s World Cup were 29% more likely to be targeted with online abuse compared to the men’s tournament held the previous year.

The SMPS, developed by FIFA in collaboration with FIFPRO, the players’ union, was initially launched during the 2022 men’s World Cup. This year, the service was extended to teams participating in the women’s finals in Australia and New Zealand. The tool has been utilized at eight FIFA tournaments over the past year, monitoring and moderating hate speech on social media platforms to shield players from harmful content.

During the Women’s World Cup, the SMPS analyzed approximately 5.1 million posts and comments in 35 different languages for abusive content. A total of 116,800 comments were subsequently hidden across Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, ranging from junk and spam to discriminatory, abusive, or threatening messages. The tool protected 697 players and coaches using 2,111 active accounts on various platforms including TikTok and X.

The report highlighted that over 150 female players received targeted discriminatory, abusive, or threatening messages throughout the tournament, with the U.S. and Argentina teams experiencing the highest levels of abuse. The abusive messages detected were predominantly homophobic, sexual, and sexist in nature, accounting for nearly half of the total. The final match, which saw Spain triumph over European Champions England 1-0, resulted in the largest spike of abusive content, with the SMPS hiding more than 6,500 comments.

See also  ChatGPT: Fintech's Ally or Adversary? Exploring Beyond the Chat

FIFA President Gianni Infantino condemned the abuse, emphasizing that there should be no place for such behavior on social media, whether within FIFA tournaments or elsewhere. FIFPRO President David Aganzo echoed this sentiment, stating that the persistent online abuse affects football players worldwide, endangering their mental health and overall well-being. Aganzo emphasized the responsibility of football to protect the players within their workspace.

The SMPS, which also proved effective during the 2023 Under-17 World Cup in Indonesia, utilizes artificial intelligence to safeguard players and prevent their followers from being exposed to hate speech. Nevertheless, despite the success of these protection tools, the prevalence of online abuse remains an alarming concern that requires continued efforts from football organizations, social media platforms, and society as a whole to curb its impact on players’ lives.

While FIFA’s SMPS has proven beneficial in minimizing abusive comments during tournaments, further action is needed to address the root causes of online abuse and create a safer digital environment for athletes. With the successful implementation of such social media protection measures, the hope is that players can focus on their performance and enjoyment of the game rather than dealing with the traumatic consequences of online abuse.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the Social Media Protection Service (SMPS) introduced by FIFA?

The SMPS is a tool developed by FIFA in collaboration with FIFPRO, the players' union, to combat online abuse. It monitors and moderates hate speech on social media platforms during FIFA tournaments, shielding players from harmful content.

How many abusive comments were successfully hidden during the Women's World Cup using the SMPS?

The SMPS successfully hid nearly 117,000 abusive comments during the Women's World Cup.

How many posts and comments did the SMPS analyze during the Women's World Cup?

The SMPS analyzed approximately 5.1 million posts and comments in 35 different languages during the Women's World Cup.

Which social media platforms did the SMPS monitor for abusive content during the tournament?

The SMPS monitored Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube for abusive content during the Women's World Cup.

Which teams at the Women's World Cup experienced the highest levels of online abuse?

The U.S. and Argentina teams experienced the highest levels of online abuse during the Women's World Cup.

What types of abusive messages were predominantly detected during the tournament?

Predominantly homophobic, sexual, and sexist messages were detected, accounting for nearly half of the total abusive messages.

How many players and coaches were protected using the SMPS during the tournament?

The SMPS protected 697 players and coaches using 2,111 active accounts on various social media platforms.

What was the largest spike of abusive content detected during the Women's World Cup?

The final match between Spain and England, which saw Spain's victory, resulted in the largest spike of abusive content, with the SMPS hiding more than 6,500 comments.

How does FIFA President Gianni Infantino respond to the online abuse?

FIFA President Gianni Infantino condemned the abuse, stating that there should be no place for such behavior on social media, whether within FIFA tournaments or elsewhere.

What impact does online abuse have on football players, according to FIFPRO President David Aganzo?

FIFPRO President David Aganzo stated that online abuse endangers the mental health and overall well-being of football players worldwide and emphasized the responsibility of football to protect its players within their workspace.

How does the SMPS utilize artificial intelligence to protect players?

The SMPS utilizes artificial intelligence to analyze social media content and hide or moderate abusive comments to safeguard players and prevent their followers from being exposed to hate speech.

Is the SMPS effective in minimizing abusive comments during FIFA tournaments?

Yes, the SMPS has proven beneficial in minimizing abusive comments during FIFA tournaments, as demonstrated by the significant number of abusive comments hidden during the Women's World Cup.

What additional actions are needed to address online abuse?

While the SMPS has been successful in minimizing abusive comments, additional actions are needed to address the root causes of online abuse. This includes efforts from football organizations, social media platforms, and society as a whole to create a safer digital environment for athletes.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.