US Senators call for assessment of harm caused by Generative AI

Date:

US Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for a detailed technology assessment of generative artificial intelligence (AI), stating it carries serious harms. In a letter to the head of the Government Accountability Office, Markey and Peters cited risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information. The letter calls generative AI a double-edged sword and argues that Congress urgently needs non-partisan, technical expertise to understand the costs of the technology. Tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

See also  OpenAI Unveils Sora: AI Tool Converts Text into Stunning Videos

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is generative artificial intelligence (AI)?

Generative AI refers to technology that is capable of creating or generating new content, such as voice, text, or images, based on previously analyzed data.

Why have US Senators called for a technology assessment of generative AI?

Senators Edward Markey and Gary Peters have called for such an assessment because they believe generative AI carries serious harms, including risks such as manipulative voice, text and image synthesis, deepfakes, and AI chatbots that provide harmful and incorrect information.

Can generative AI be both beneficial and harmful?

Yes, as referred to in the letter by Markey and Peters, generative AI is a double-edged sword, meaning that while it has the potential to benefit society, it can also cause harm if not properly regulated and overseen.

Why does Congress need non-partisan technical expertise to understand the costs of generative AI?

Congress needs non-partisan technical expertise in order to fully understand the potential negative consequences of generative AI, as well as the benefits, and make informed decisions on proper regulation and oversight.

Have concerns about generative AI been raised before?

Yes, tech executives and industry experts have previously raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of generative AI without proper regulation and oversight.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Anaya Kapoor
Anaya Kapoor
Anaya is our dedicated writer and manager for the ChatGPT Latest News category. With her finger on the pulse of the AI community, Anaya keeps readers up to date with the latest developments, breakthroughs, and applications of ChatGPT. Her articles provide valuable insights into the rapidly evolving landscape of conversational AI.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Samsung’s Foldable Phones: The Future of Smartphone Screens

Discover how Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 6 is leading the way with innovative software & dual-screen design for the future of smartphones.

Unlocking Franchise Success: Leveraging Cognitive Biases in Sales

Unlock franchise success by leveraging cognitive biases in sales. Use psychology to craft compelling narratives and drive successful deals.

Wiz Walks Away from $23B Google Deal, Pursues IPO Instead

Wiz Walks away from $23B Google Deal in favor of pursuing IPO. Investors gear up for trading with updates on market performance and key developments.

Southern Punjab Secretariat Leads Pakistan in AI Adoption, Prominent Figures Attend Demo

Experience how South Punjab Secretariat leads Pakistan in AI adoption with a demo attended by prominent figures. Learn about their groundbreaking initiative.