Title: Students Express Mixed Sentiments Regarding ChatGPT in Education
The emergence of ChatGPT, an AI-powered language model, has generated significant discussion in the academic world. However, what do students themselves think about its implementation? We interviewed a group of students to gather their perspectives on ChatGPT.
Chan Yan Chang, a computer science student, appreciates the convenience of using ChatGPT for sourcing codes while working on projects. Although acknowledging the code’s occasional shortcomings, Chan finds the AI tool immensely helpful in providing a general understanding and a starting point for further research.
Lau Leyoung believes that ChatGPT enhances productivity, particularly with reference citations. While acknowledging concerns about academic integrity, Lau emphasizes the importance of using the tool wisely. Rather than relying on it to write essays, students should focus on developing their own opinions and use ChatGPT as a means of refining ideas.
Krystal Tan Yu Qiao acknowledges ChatGPT’s usefulness in consolidating and finding research information but raises valid concerns about errors in responses and the lack of proper source citations. Questioning potential bias in the produced information, Krystal advises caution when using the platform.
Stefan Dian Djarkasih, who struggles with English, finds ChatGPT helpful in extracting key points and aiding writing tasks. However, Stefan believes that AI will not gain ultimate control as its abilities are derived from human input.
Mateen Khaliq Noor Muzir suggests that while ChatGPT can be misused for cheating in education, the root of the problem lies in flaws within the education system. Usage of AI like ChatGPT has shed light on these issues, such as focusing on keywords, word count, and formatting rather than critical thinking.
The interviews reveal a range of perspectives among students regarding ChatGPT. While some appreciate the tool for its convenience and productivity-enhancing capabilities, others remain cautious, recognizing potential errors, biases, and ethical dilemmas. It is evident that ChatGPT’s integration into the educational landscape requires careful consideration, with an emphasis on effective use, awareness of limitations, and proper guidance for both teachers and students.
As the discussion surrounding ChatGPT continues, educational institutions must address these concerns and establish guidelines to maximize its benefits while minimizing potential pitfalls. Rather than rejecting the use of ChatGPT altogether, schools should embrace it as a valuable resource and encourage its responsible application in the learning process. By preparing students to navigate the use of AI tools effectively, educators can foster critical thinking, creativity, and independent analysis, ensuring that individuals gain valuable insights while still developing essential skills for the future.
