Sarah Silverman has filed a lawsuit against the creators of ChatGPT, accusing them of illegally using her book to train their artificial intelligence (AI) system. The lawsuit, which is a class-action copyright lawsuit, also includes authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden. They allege that OpenAI and Meta, the owners of LLaMA, utilized their books without permission to train their AI language models.
According to the suit, both ChatGPT and LLaMA likely obtained the authors’ works from shadow library databases such as Library Genesis and Z-Library, which are considered to be flagrantly illegal.
Documents obtained by The Daily Beast revealed that ChatGPT can summarize the authors’ books, resulting in a derivative work of copyrighted material. The lawsuit claims that if prompted, ChatGPT will summarize any copyrighted book.
Furthermore, the lawsuits argue that the very existence of these AI models could be deemed illegal under the Copyright Act, as they require potentially copyrighted information to function as intended.
The OpenAI lawsuit questions whether ChatGPT itself is an infringing derivative work, while the Meta lawsuit alleges that the LLaMA models are also infringing derivative works.
Although the lawsuits currently only include the three plaintiffs, they suggest that there could be thousands of others in the US whose copyrights may be violated.
In total, the two lawsuits bring forth six counts of copyright violations, as well as claims of negligence, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition. The authors are seeking statutory damages and restitution of profits.
It remains to be seen how this legal battle will unfold and what implications it may have for the use of copyrighted material in training AI systems.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Who has filed a lawsuit against the creators of ChatGPT?
Sarah Silverman, along with authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden, have filed a lawsuit against the creators of ChatGPT.
What is the basis of the lawsuit?
The lawsuit alleges that the creators of ChatGPT illegally used the plaintiffs' books to train their AI system without permission.
What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) system developed by OpenAI and Meta. It is a language model that can generate human-like responses in text-based conversations.
How did ChatGPT allegedly obtain the authors' works?
The lawsuit suggests that ChatGPT likely obtained the authors' works from shadow library databases such as Library Genesis and Z-Library, which are considered to be illegally sharing copyrighted material.
What does the lawsuit claim regarding ChatGPT's ability to summarize copyrighted books?
According to the lawsuit, ChatGPT is capable of summarizing any copyrighted book if prompted, resulting in a derivative work of copyrighted material without authorization.
Are AI models like ChatGPT potentially illegal?
The lawsuits argue that the very existence of AI models like ChatGPT could be deemed illegal under the Copyright Act, as they require potentially copyrighted information to function as intended.
How many plaintiffs are currently involved in the lawsuits?
The lawsuits currently include the three plaintiffs mentioned, but they suggest that there may be thousands of others in the US whose copyrights could potentially be violated.
What are the counts of violations mentioned in the lawsuits?
The lawsuits bring forth six counts of copyright violations and also include claims of negligence, unjust enrichment, and unfair competition.
What are the authors seeking in the lawsuits?
The authors are seeking statutory damages and restitution of profits resulting from the alleged unauthorized use of their copyrighted material.
What could be the implications of this legal battle?
The outcome of this legal battle could have implications for the use of copyrighted material in training AI systems and may potentially shape future regulations or guidelines in the field.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
