PFOA and PFOS Alternative PFAS Show Higher Binding Affinity for PPARα in Novel Machine Learning Study

Date:

[PFOA and PFOS Alternative PFAS Show Higher Binding Affinity for PPARα in Novel Machine Learning Study]

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have long been used in products for their water-repellent and stain-resistant properties. However, the environmental and health risks associated with PFAS, particularly long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids such as PFOA and PFOS, have raised concerns globally. These substances are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic, leading to their regulation under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.

One of the key toxicological aspects of PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS, is their ability to disrupt lipid metabolism through interaction with a receptor called PPARα. This receptor plays a crucial role in lipid metabolism, energy balance, and cell differentiation. When PFAS bind to PPARα, it disrupts signaling pathways and causes various adverse biological effects.

While the hazards of PFOA and PFOS are well-known, there is limited knowledge regarding the potential risks posed by thousands of alternative PFAS types, including the next-generation ones. To address this knowledge gap, researchers conducted a novel machine learning study to predict the binding affinity of PFAS to PPARα.

In this study, researchers utilized SMILES data for 6,798 PFAS from the U.S. EPA database. They employed the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) to calculate 206 molecular descriptors and the binding affinity (known as S-score) of each PFAS to PPARα. Interestingly, the results showed that 4,089 PFAS exhibited lower S-scores compared to both PFOA and PFOS.

Through a systematic selection of essential molecular descriptors, the researchers developed a machine learning model. Remarkably, this model demonstrated good predictive performance using only three descriptors, achieving an R2 value of 0.72. The key molecular characteristics that influenced the binding affinity of PFAS to PPARα were found to be molecular size (b_single) and electrostatic properties (BCUT_PEOE_3 and PEOE_VSA_PPOS).

See also  OpenAI Study Finds Limited AI Impact on Biological Threat Creation

The study also shed light on the potential toxicity of alternative PFAS. While these substances are generally considered safer than their legacy counterparts, the researchers found that certain alternative PFAS with numerous carbon atoms and ether groups exhibited a higher binding affinity for PPARα than PFOA and PFOS. This finding raises concerns about the potential health effects associated with these alternative PFAS.

Moreover, the novel machine learning approach developed in this study surpasses traditional methods in terms of interpretability. It offers deeper insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the toxicity of PFAS. This approach can be extended beyond PFAS-PPARα binding to study other ligand-receptor interactions and structure-property relationships.

Despite its success, the study has limitations. It primarily focused on the interaction of PFAS with PPARα, while PFAS may induce toxicity through other receptors as well. Additionally, it is important to note that a high binding score does not necessarily indicate toxicity. Therefore, experimental verification is crucial to determine the actual toxicity of PFAS.

Nevertheless, this novel approach provides a rapid and cost-effective screening method for PFAS, allowing for a preliminary understanding of their potential toxicity. It also serves as a valuable tool for guiding further in-depth experimental investigations.

In summary, a machine learning study has revealed the higher binding affinity of certain alternative PFAS for PPARα, a receptor involved in lipid metabolism. Although alternative PFAS are generally considered safer, the study highlights potential health concerns associated with specific alternative PFAS compounds. The novel machine learning approach provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of PFAS toxicity and enables rapid screening for potential hazards. Further research and experimental verification are necessary to fully understand the risks posed by PFAS and guide appropriate risk mitigation strategies.

See also  ML Models Uncover Link Between Western US Fires and Central US Hailstorms

Source: [Ehime University website](https://www.ehime-u.ac.jp/en/)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What are PFAS?

PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. They are a group of synthetic chemicals that have been widely used in various products due to their water-repellent and stain-resistant properties.

Why are PFAS a cause for concern?

PFAS, particularly long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids like PFOA and PFOS, are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic. They have been found to pose environmental and health risks. These substances have raised concerns globally and are regulated under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.

How do PFAS disrupt lipid metabolism?

PFAS have the ability to bind to a receptor called PPARα, which is involved in lipid metabolism, energy balance, and cell differentiation. When PFAS bind to PPARα, it disrupts signaling pathways and can cause various adverse biological effects.

What was the purpose of the machine learning study mentioned in the article?

The machine learning study aimed to predict the binding affinity of different PFAS to PPARα. This knowledge helps in understanding and assessing the potential risks posed by various alternative PFAS types, including the next-generation ones.

How was the machine learning study conducted?

The researchers utilized data on thousands of PFAS from the U.S. EPA database and applied the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) to calculate molecular descriptors and binding affinity for each PFAS. They then used a machine learning model developed from selected molecular descriptors to predict the binding affinity.

What were the key findings of the machine learning study?

The study found that a significant number of alternative PFAS demonstrated lower binding affinity to PPARα compared to PFOA and PFOS. However, certain alternative PFAS with numerous carbon atoms and ether groups exhibited a higher binding affinity than PFOA and PFOS, raising concerns about their potential health effects.

Does a higher binding affinity indicate higher toxicity?

Although a higher binding affinity can indicate a greater potential for interaction with PPARα, it does not directly translate to higher toxicity. Experimental verification is crucial to determine the actual toxicity of PFAS.

What are the limitations of the machine learning study?

The study primarily focused on the interaction of PFAS with PPARα, while PFAS may induce toxicity through other receptors as well. Additionally, experimental verification is necessary to fully understand the toxicity of PFAS and any potential health effects.

How can the machine learning approach be extended beyond PFAS-PPARα binding?

The machine learning approach developed in this study has the potential to study other ligand-receptor interactions and structure-property relationships beyond PFAS-PPARα binding. It offers deeper insights into molecular mechanisms underlying toxicity.

What are the implications of this study?

The study provides a rapid and cost-effective screening method for preliminary assessment of PFAS toxicity. It highlights the importance of considering specific alternative PFAS compounds that may have higher binding affinity for PPARα. Further research and experimental verification are needed to fully understand the risks associated with PFAS and guide appropriate risk mitigation strategies.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.