NYC Lawyers Fined $5,000 for Submitting Fake Documents via ChatGPT

Date:

Two New York lawyers have been fined $5,000, a legal first, for using fake research created by OpenAI’s chatbot ChatGPT for a submission in an injury claim against Avianca airline. Attorneys Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca had represented Roberto Mata who claimed his knee was injured when he was struck by a metal serving cart on an Avianca flight from El Salvador to Kennedy International Airport in New York in 2019. Schwartz submitted a 10-page legal brief, featuring six relevant court decisions, half of which did not exist. Judge Kevin Castel said the lawyers acted in bad faith by relying on ChatGPT’s submissions, even after judicial orders questioned their authenticity. Schwartz and LoDuca were fined as attorneys are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of any submissions, including those created using AI. Castel added that ChatGPT was a reliable artificial intelligence tool for assistance, but existing rules impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings.

See also  What is Jailbreaking ChatGPT and Why Is it Claiming the Ukraine War is Fake?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is the news about?

Two New York lawyers have been fined $5,000 for submitting fake documents in a personal injury claim against Avianca airline.

Who were the lawyers involved in this case?

The lawyers involved in this case were Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca.

What is the name of the chatbot that was used to create fake documents?

The chatbot used to create fake documents is called ChatGPT, created by OpenAI.

What was the reason for the fine imposed on the lawyers?

The lawyers were fined because they acted in bad faith by relying on ChatGPT's submissions even after judicial orders questioned their authenticity. Lawyers are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of any submissions, including those created using AI.

What did the judge say about ChatGPT as an AI tool for assistance?

The judge said that ChatGPT was a reliable artificial intelligence tool for assistance, but existing rules impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings.

What is the significance of this case?

This case is significant as it is the first time lawyers have been fined for using fake research created by AI. It highlights the responsibility of lawyers to ensure the accuracy of any submissions, including those created using AI.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Aniket Patel
Aniket Patel
Aniket is a skilled writer at ChatGPT Global News, contributing to the ChatGPT News category. With a passion for exploring the diverse applications of ChatGPT, Aniket brings informative and engaging content to our readers. His articles cover a wide range of topics, showcasing the versatility and impact of ChatGPT in various domains.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Gemini Outshines ChatGPT in AI Showdown: Who Wins?

Gemini outshines ChatGPT in a fierce AI showdown across multiple topics. Find out who emerges victorious in this epic battle!

SaaS Governance Tightens amid Decline in Shadow IT: Report

SaaS governance strengthens as shadow IT declines - Report reveals significant reduction in unauthorized SaaS tools within organizations.

Israel’s AI Military Tactics in Gaza Cause Unprecedented Civilian Toll

Israel's AI military tactics in Gaza causing unprecedented civilian toll raises concerns among UN experts, highlighting destruction and loss.

Global 3D Imaging Market Revolutionizes Industries: Key Players Include Panasonic, Sony, Trimble

Revolutionize industries with Global 3D Imaging Market- Key players include Panasonic, Sony, Trimble. Explore growth opportunities now!