OpenAI has recently been facing a series of lawsuits and investigations. The Federal Trade Commission is currently investigating the generative AI leader for possible violations of consumer protection laws. Additionally, comedian and author Sarah Silverman has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement of her memoir published in 2010.
In the midst of these legal battles, OpenAI’s GPT-4 model has also come under scrutiny. Community members on OpenAI’s developer forum have been discussing a perceived decline in the quality of GPT-4. Some users have noticed a decrease in reasoning and logic capabilities, as well as poorer overall results. Speculations have arisen regarding possible changes to the learning algorithm, training data, or model infrastructure.
One commenter even compared the previous version of GPT-4 to a great assistant sous chef and the current version to a dishwasher. In response to these concerns, Peter Welinder, the VP of product at OpenAI, took to Twitter to clarify that GPT-4 has not become dumber. He claimed that each new version is actually smarter than its predecessor. He acknowledged that using the model more extensively may reveal certain issues that were not previously apparent and encouraged users to provide examples of regression for further investigation.
While Welinder’s comments garnered support from some users, others disagreed, deeming GPT-4 plain worse. Compounding the issue is the fact that GPT-4 remains a black box, leaving developers uncertain about any changes made to the model.
This lack of transparency has been a point of contention since GPT-4’s release in March. Many criticized the accompanying technical report, highlighting its failure to provide crucial details about the architecture, model size, hardware, training compute, dataset construction, and training method.
In summary, OpenAI denies making GPT-4 dumber and maintains that each new version is an improvement. However, user feedback suggests a decline in quality. The lack of transparency surrounding the model’s inner workings continues to be a source of frustration within the developer community.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Has OpenAI made GPT-4 less intelligent?
No, according to OpenAI's VP of product, GPT-4 has not become dumber. They claim that each new version of the model is actually smarter than its predecessor.
Why are some users claiming that GPT-4 has declined in quality?
Some users on OpenAI's developer forum have noticed a perceived decline in reasoning and logic capabilities, as well as poorer overall results with GPT-4.
What did Peter Welinder, the VP of product at OpenAI, say in response to these concerns?
Peter Welinder took to Twitter to clarify that GPT-4 has not become dumber. He acknowledged that using the model more extensively may reveal certain issues that were not previously apparent and encouraged users to provide examples of regression for further investigation.
Are there any changes made to GPT-4's learning algorithm, training data, or model infrastructure?
The lack of transparency surrounding GPT-4's inner workings leaves developers uncertain about any changes made to the model. OpenAI has been criticized for the lack of details provided in the accompanying technical report, such as architecture, model size, training compute, dataset construction, and training method.
Are there ongoing legal battles involving OpenAI?
Yes, OpenAI is currently facing investigations by the Federal Trade Commission for possible violations of consumer protection laws, as well as a lawsuit filed by comedian Sarah Silverman for copyright infringement.
How has the developer community responded to the lack of transparency and potential decline in GPT-4's quality?
The lack of transparency surrounding GPT-4's inner workings has been a source of frustration within the developer community. While some users support OpenAI's claims that each new version is an improvement, others disagree and believe that GPT-4 is worse.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
