New Jersey Firm Accused of Illegally Supplying Banned Chinese AI Surveillance Cameras, US

Date:

New Jersey Firm Accused of Illegally Supplying Banned Chinese AI Surveillance Cameras

Authorities in the United States have charged a New Jersey-based company, Packetalk, with illegally supplying Chinese AI surveillance cameras that are banned in the country. According to reports from Court Watch and 404 Media, the company is alleged to have deceived state and local agencies into purchasing the banned cameras, resulting in a whopping $35 million expenditure. It is believed that Packetalk even facilitated the use of federal Covid recovery funds, totaling $15 million, to pay for the rebranded equipment.

The cameras in question are reportedly rebranded products from Dahua, a Chinese surveillance company. Dahua products were blacklisted in 2019 due to their involvement in the mass detention and persecution of Uyghur Muslims in China. The systems were also flagged as a potential national security risk by the US government. Furthermore, there are allegations that Dahua’s products supported Russia in its invasion of Ukraine.

Packetalk’s executives have denied any wrongdoing, but they did admit to marketing facial recognition technology based on ethnicity analysis using biometric data. It is important to note that the complaint against Packetalk does not directly implicate Dahua in any illegal activity.

According to Court Watch, a federal criminal complaint charges Packetalk CEO Tamer Zakhary with wire fraud and false statements related to the sales pitches and consultations that concealed the true nature of the banned systems. The complaint refers to incidents where Packetalk covered Dahua logos on the cameras with its own branding and altered their color. While the cameras supported facial recognition using Dahua software, Zakhary claims that only Packetalk’s software was running on the cameras sold in the US. The rebranded Dahua cameras were marketed as capable of license plate recognition.

See also  Rising Labor Costs in US Auto Industry Drive Investment in Automation

The complaint also cites email exchanges between Zakhary and Dahua, suggesting Zakhary attempted to secure a discounted price due to the ban. In one email, an official appears to caution Zakhary that importing the banned cameras is illegal under federal law. The complaint further alleges that executives discussed moving the system storage to Mexico to conceal Dahua’s involvement.

Zakhary, during conversations with FBI agents, reportedly stated that the rebranded cameras had replaced all valuable components with domestic alternatives before being sold. Packetalk seems to be a small storefront business that sells surveillance products to public safety officials.

It is crucial to note that these accusations and charges are yet to be proven in court. The legal proceedings will determine the outcome and any potential consequences for Packetalk and its executives.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

What is Packetalk accused of?

Packetalk is accused of illegally supplying Chinese AI surveillance cameras that are banned in the United States.

How much money is Packetalk alleged to have deceived state and local agencies into spending?

According to reports, Packetalk allegedly deceived state and local agencies into spending a total of $35 million on the banned Chinese surveillance cameras.

How did Packetalk facilitate the purchase of these cameras?

Packetalk is alleged to have facilitated the purchase of the banned cameras by using federal Covid recovery funds, totaling $15 million, to pay for the rebranded equipment.

What is the origin of the cameras supplied by Packetalk?

The cameras supplied by Packetalk are reportedly rebranded products from Dahua, a Chinese surveillance company.

Why were Dahua products blacklisted in 2019?

Dahua products were blacklisted in 2019 due to their involvement in the mass detention and persecution of Uyghur Muslims in China. They were also flagged as a national security risk by the US government.

Did Dahua participate in any other controversial activities?

There are allegations that Dahua's products supported Russia in its invasion of Ukraine.

What admissions did Packetalk's executives make?

Packetalk's executives admitted to marketing facial recognition technology based on ethnicity analysis using biometric data.

What charges does the federal criminal complaint bring against Packetalk CEO Tamer Zakhary?

The federal criminal complaint charges Tamer Zakhary with wire fraud and false statements related to sales pitches and consultations that concealed the true nature of the banned systems.

How did Packetalk alter the banned cameras?

Packetalk covered Dahua logos on the cameras with its own branding and altered their color.

What was the marketing claim for the rebranded cameras?

The rebranded Dahua cameras were marketed as capable of license plate recognition.

Are there any communications suggesting Zakhary was aware of the ban?

Yes, email exchanges between Zakhary and Dahua suggest Zakhary attempted to secure a discounted price knowing importing the banned cameras is illegal under federal law.

What did Zakhary reportedly state about the rebranded cameras?

Zakhary reportedly stated that the rebranded cameras had replaced all valuable components with domestic alternatives before being sold.

Is the involvement of Dahua in illegal activity mentioned in the complaint?

The complaint against Packetalk does not directly implicate Dahua in any illegal activity.

Have the allegations and charges against Packetalk been proven in court?

No, these accusations and charges are yet to be proven in court. The legal proceedings will determine the outcome and any potential consequences for Packetalk and its executives.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.