Two lawyers who submitted fake case citations generated by ChatGPT will face a $5,000 fine, as well as the requirement to contact each falsely identified judge, according to a ruling from U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel. Castel’s 34-page opinion did not require Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca to issue apologies, citing the lack of sincerity in required apologies. The lawyers admitted to using the fake citations in a court filing, leading to the sanctions. The ruling comes as legal professionals continue to debate the use of AI in the legal profession.
Lawyers Fined $5K for Submitting Fake Case Citations Generated by ChatGPT Judge in New York.
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Samsung’s Foldable Phones: The Future of Smartphone Screens
Discover how Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 6 is leading the way with innovative software & dual-screen design for the future of smartphones.
Unlocking Franchise Success: Leveraging Cognitive Biases in Sales
Unlock franchise success by leveraging cognitive biases in sales. Use psychology to craft compelling narratives and drive successful deals.
Wiz Walks Away from $23B Google Deal, Pursues IPO Instead
Wiz Walks away from $23B Google Deal in favor of pursuing IPO. Investors gear up for trading with updates on market performance and key developments.
Southern Punjab Secretariat Leads Pakistan in AI Adoption, Prominent Figures Attend Demo
Experience how South Punjab Secretariat leads Pakistan in AI adoption with a demo attended by prominent figures. Learn about their groundbreaking initiative.