Two lawyers have been fined $5,000 for submitting a brief in an airline injury case that featured made-up legal precedents generated by an AI chatbot called ChatGPT. Steven A Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, working for New York-based firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, stood by their submission even after it was highlighted as fake by opposing counsel. Both eventually apologised to the court. Judge Kevin Castel said in his sanction order that AI had potential uses in the legal industry, however, good lawyers appropriately obtain assistance from junior lawyers, law students, contract lawyers, legal encyclopedias and databases such as Westlaw and LexisNexis.Â
Lawyers Fined $5,000 for Submitting ChatGPT Hallucinations in Court
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Samsung’s Foldable Phones: The Future of Smartphone Screens
Discover how Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 6 is leading the way with innovative software & dual-screen design for the future of smartphones.
Unlocking Franchise Success: Leveraging Cognitive Biases in Sales
Unlock franchise success by leveraging cognitive biases in sales. Use psychology to craft compelling narratives and drive successful deals.
Wiz Walks Away from $23B Google Deal, Pursues IPO Instead
Wiz Walks away from $23B Google Deal in favor of pursuing IPO. Investors gear up for trading with updates on market performance and key developments.
Southern Punjab Secretariat Leads Pakistan in AI Adoption, Prominent Figures Attend Demo
Experience how South Punjab Secretariat leads Pakistan in AI adoption with a demo attended by prominent figures. Learn about their groundbreaking initiative.