Lawyers Express Regret Over Using ChatGPT for Legal Advice

Date:

Manhattan attorneys Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca recently brought a case to the district court, which they thought was a slam dunk. Their client was seeking damages for an injury sustained on a 2019 flight with Avianca, the Colombian airline. Schwartz, hoping to provide concrete evidence supporting his claim, submitted a comprehensive filing to the court, referencing several past cases where other plaintiffs had prevailed against other airlines for injuries similar to the client’s. However, there was a major issue with his filing. Some of the cases were entirely fictitious, and the airlines mentioned did not exist. It turned out that Schwartz had asked ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-powered chatbot, to conduct legal research, assuming that it would provide accurate and valid results.

During the court hearing, the judge lashed out at the attorneys, calling the legal filing legal gibberish. Despite Schwartz’s best intentions, he hadn’t realized that ChatGPT could provide fabricated information. In February, an experiment was conducted with ChatGPT on a rather obscure subject, and it generated a list of five excellent books, two of which did not exist. Hence, the system’s credibility is questionable when it comes to creating fiction.

However, ChatGPT has been successful in other areas of research. Recently, researchers collaborated with OpenAI’s ChatGPT to develop a tomato-harvesting robot, marking a new era in human-AI collaboration in robotics. By posing a question to the system about the future’s greatest challenges for humanity, the researchers gave it the full control to suggest ideas for prolonging the species. After extensive discussions with ChatGPT, the decision was made to focus on food supply and create a tomato-harvesting robot. The bot provided valuable input, determining the best motor to use, and the ideal material for the robot’s gripping arm to avoid damaging the tomatoes.

See also  Genie CEO Akash Nigam Spends RS 2 Lakh Monthly on ChatGPT to Save Time for Employees

While ChatGPT’s abilities hold promise, it’s essential to consider its limitations in legal research. It is crucial to verify results to avoid fabricated legal research. However, the AI system continues to be an important tool in scientific research and technological development and has shown great potential in aiding researchers in achieving better accuracy and efficiency in problem-solving.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.