Lawyers Cite Fake Cases Created by ChatGPT; Face Disastrous Outcome in Court

Date:

Two lawyers from Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were fined $5,000 and lost their case after using an AI chatbot called ChatGPT to research court filings that cited six fake cases invented by the tool. Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca abandoned their responsibilities when they submitted non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by the artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT, according to Judge Kevin Castel. The lawyers were also required to send letters to six real judges who were falsely identified as the author of the fake opinions cited in their legal filings. The lawsuit, Roberto Mata vs. Avianca, was originally filed in a New York state court but was moved to US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The judge granted Avianca’s motion to dismiss the case and described the legal analysis in one of the fake cases as gibberish. ChatGPT is made by OpenAI and has been used in legal research.

See also  Experiencing Success with ChatGPT: A Woman Informs Her Employer About Quitting

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

Who were the lawyers involved in this incident?

The lawyers involved were Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca from Levidow, Levidow & Oberman.

What led to the lawyers' fine and loss of their case?

The lawyers used an AI chatbot called ChatGPT to research court filings, which cited six fake cases invented by the tool. They submitted non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by ChatGPT, which led to their fine and loss of the case.

Who was the judge presiding over the case?

The judge presiding over the case was Judge Kevin Castel.

What were the consequences faced by the lawyers for their actions?

The lawyers were fined $5,000 and lost their case. They were also required to send letters to six real judges who were falsely identified as the author of the fake opinions cited in their legal filings.

What was the name of the lawsuit that was filed originally in a New York state court?

The name of the lawsuit that was filed originally in a New York state court was Roberto Mata vs. Avianca.

Who created the artificial intelligence tool called ChatGPT?

ChatGPT was created by OpenAI.

Has ChatGPT been used in legal research before?

Yes, ChatGPT has been used in legal research.

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Aniket Patel
Aniket Patel
Aniket is a skilled writer at ChatGPT Global News, contributing to the ChatGPT News category. With a passion for exploring the diverse applications of ChatGPT, Aniket brings informative and engaging content to our readers. His articles cover a wide range of topics, showcasing the versatility and impact of ChatGPT in various domains.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Canada Boosts Arctic Defence Amid Climate Change Threats

Canada ramps up Arctic defense amid climate change threats with new policy, Arctic-compatible vehicles, and potential nuclear submarines.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Joins Billionaire Club, Trails Behind Elon Musk

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman now a billionaire, but still trails behind Elon Musk in tech industry dominance.

Smart Ways Retirees Can Maximize Social Security Checks

Discover 7 smart ways retirees can maximize their Social Security checks, from covering essentials to investing for the future.

Generative AI Surge: ChatGPT Revolutionizes Workplace Dynamics

Discover how ChatGPT is revolutionizing workplace dynamics among younger employees. Explore the rising trend of generative AI tools in the workplace.