Following a dispute between Adobe and Ansel Adams’ estate, the tech giant has removed AI-generated images inspired by the iconic photographer from its stock licensing platform. The estate had expressed frustration over the presence of AI-generated images using Adams’ name for sale on Adobe Stock.
In response to the estate’s concerns, Adobe removed the filter for generative AI content specific to Ansel Adams’ name. However, the AI toggle remains for other more generic searches.
The estate, managed by Adams’ Threads account, took to social media to express their displeasure, highlighting the issue with a screenshot of offending images labeled as Ansel Adams-Style Landscape Photophraphy AI Generated. These images imitated Adams’ signature black-and-white style and were available for licensing on Adobe Stock.
Acknowledging the estate’s concerns, Adobe promptly removed the AI-generated, Adams-inspired content from its platform. The company cited its Generative AI content policy, emphasizing the importance of respecting third-party rights and avoiding copyright infringement.
Although searches for Ansel Adams on Adobe Stock no longer display AI-generated content with the photographer’s name, other photographers like Roger Deakins and Helmut Newton have faced similar issues. PCMag found generative AI images in their styles available for licensing on the platform. Adobe has yet to address these specific cases.
The dispute underlines a broader challenge faced by artists and their estates regarding unauthorized use of their names and works in AI-generated content. The Adams estate emphasizes that while they encourage artistic inspiration from Adams’ work, they vehemently oppose any unauthorized use of his name to sell products, including digital creations.
As tech companies like Adobe continue to develop generative AI tools, balancing innovation with respect for intellectual property becomes increasingly crucial. The incident with Ansel Adams’ estate serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding artists’ rights in the digital age.
The resolution between Adobe and the Adams estate highlights the necessity for tech firms to implement robust policies that safeguard artists’ legacies and prevent unauthorized use of their works in AI-generated content. Adobe’s response to this issue sets a precedent for addressing similar disputes in the future, signaling a commitment to maintaining respect for artists’ rights.
