Adobe’s generative AI image generation platform, Firefly, has received backlash from contributors to Adobe Stock, who claim their images were used without their consent to train the platform. The platform, which is promoted as a commercially-safe generative AI tool, has seen users generate over 200 million images since its launch in March. However, contributors argue that the popularity of gen AI images are cannibalizing the Adobe Stock platform, making it less likely for users to purchase human-generated images.
Many contributors feel that Adobe’s actions were not only unethical, but are also harming the marketplace for contributors. They believe that a more ethical approach would have been to notify Adobe Stock contributors of the Firefly AI training and offer them the choice to opt out at the beginning.
Even though Adobe claims that it trained Firefly on millions of licensed images in its royalty-free Adobe Stock offering, including openly licensed content and public domain content without copyright restrictions, it has not been transparent with its contributors. The artists also believe that the flood of gen AI images onto Adobe Stock is making it an unfeasible platform for them to operate in.
Industry experts are split on whether Adobe’s Terms of Service agreements hold up legally. They also have differing views on whether generative AI images can be considered derivative works of the images used to train them.
Contributors argue that their work is being used to compete against them in the marketplace, despite the fact that they helped create Adobe Stock from the beginning. Meanwhile, companies such as Adobe are moving too quickly and being reckless with technology that no one truly understands, according to some artists.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
What is Firefly?
Firefly is a generative AI image generation platform developed by Adobe.
What is the purpose of Firefly?
The purpose of Firefly is to provide a commercially-safe generative AI tool for users to generate images.
What is Adobe Stock?
Adobe Stock is a marketplace for buying and selling stock images, photos, and graphics.
Why are Adobe Stock contributors unhappy with Firefly?
Adobe Stock contributors are unhappy with Firefly because they claim their images were used without their consent to train the platform. They also argue that the popularity of gen AI images is cannibalizing the Adobe Stock platform, making it less likely for users to purchase human-generated images.
What do Adobe Stock contributors believe would have been a more ethical approach?
Adobe Stock contributors believe that a more ethical approach would have been to notify them of the Firefly AI training and offer them the choice to opt out at the beginning.
What images did Adobe use to train Firefly?
Adobe claims that it trained Firefly on millions of licensed images in its royalty-free Adobe Stock offering, including openly licensed content and public domain content without copyright restrictions.
Are industry experts split on whether Adobe's Terms of Service agreements hold up legally?
Yes, industry experts are split on whether Adobe's Terms of Service agreements hold up legally.
Can generative AI images be considered derivative works of the images used to train them?
Industry experts have differing views on whether generative AI images can be considered derivative works of the images used to train them.
How are contributors feeling about the flood of gen AI images onto Adobe Stock?
Contributors feel that the flood of gen AI images onto Adobe Stock is making it an unfeasible platform for them to operate in and that their work is being used to compete against them in the marketplace.
What are some artists saying about companies like Adobe and the technology they are using?
Some artists believe that companies like Adobe are moving too quickly and being reckless with technology that no one truly understands.
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
