Addressing Gaps in Machine Learning Technologies for Legal Document Analysis Using the Interest Theory of Rights and Hohfeldian Taxonomy

Date:

In an attempt to address the gap in machine learning methods for legal document analysis within humanities and social sciences communications, the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy are presented as a means of capturing the essential features of such texts. Using this legal theory, a stratified representation of knowledge is enabled, making it ideal for machine learning abstraction. In order to test how such legal dimensions could be identified in this domain, a novel heuristic was implemented based on philosophy and language models. Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers were used to classify Hohfeldian relations to an accuracy of 92.5% when tested on religious discrimination policy texts in the United Kingdom.

This paper contributes significantly to the advancement of legal reasoning tools and the use of machine learning to analyse human and social sciences texts. It demonstrates that despite the subtleties of differences between Hohfeldian legal relations, language models can be trained to accurately identify them. Furthermore, the paper proposes a new approach to measure human interactions via a universal ethical heuristic.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly used in public interests such as government departments, courts, and NGOs offering legal services to improve efficiency. Big data natural language processing (NLP) enables a systematic analysis of documents for new findings. Legal documents are characterised as texts that describe power interactions with consideration to outcomes of such interactions.

Rights and duties form the basis of these interactions, essentiating the importance of capturing these principal legal dimensions for machine learning. As such, the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy were proposed. This paper details how these dimensions may be identified using a philosophical heuristic and language models.

See also  Unleash Top 10 Machine Learning Optimizations for Supercharged Models

In addition, this article raises several ethical considerations to take into account when making use of machine learning in legal document analysis. Indeed, a systematic understanding of the principal dimensions of legal documents is critical to ensure that ML performs according to legal expectations. Ultimately, the implications of such technology and how it may be used ethically are to be further considered by experts in this field.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News

Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision

Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report

Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.

The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031

Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.