Two lawyers who submitted fake case citations generated by ChatGPT will face a $5,000 fine, as well as the requirement to contact each falsely identified judge, according to a ruling from U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel. Castel’s 34-page opinion did not require Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca to issue apologies, citing the lack of sincerity in required apologies. The lawyers admitted to using the fake citations in a court filing, leading to the sanctions. The ruling comes as legal professionals continue to debate the use of AI in the legal profession.
Lawyers Fined $5K for Submitting Fake Case Citations Generated by ChatGPT Judge in New York.
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Obama’s Techno-Optimism Shifts as Democrats Navigate Changing Tech Landscape
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tech Evolution: From Obama’s Optimism to Harris’s Vision
Explore the evolution of tech policy from Obama's optimism to Harris's vision at the Democratic National Convention. What's next for Democrats in tech?
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP Shares Fall 14.61% After Q2 Earnings Report
Tonix Pharmaceuticals TNXP shares decline 14.61% post-Q2 earnings report. Evaluate investment strategy based on company updates and market dynamics.
The Future of Good Jobs: Why College Degrees are Essential through 2031
Discover the future of good jobs through 2031 and why college degrees are essential. Learn more about job projections and AI's influence.