Two lawyers who used an AI chatbot to generate false cases in order to win a lawsuit have appeared before US District Judge Kevin Castel to explain why they ought not to be sanctioned. The case has caused amusement, not least due to the fact that the chatbot in question was the OpenAI product ChatGPT. The lawyers involved, Steven Schwartz and Peter LoDuca, submitted a “good faith workaround” using the AI tool as Westlaw and LexisNexis were not available to them. They claimed that the legal mistakes made were inadvertent and so sought an absence of sanctions. However, it is unclear if Schwartz will be punished for ChatGPT’s production of extended excerpts and favourable quotations from fake cases.
Lawyers confess to fabricating cases with ChatGPT, beg court for mercy
Date:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Related to the Above News
Please note that the FAQs provided on this page are based on the news article published. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, it is always recommended to consult relevant authorities or professionals before making any decisions or taking action based on the FAQs or the news article.
More like thisRelated
Exclusive AI Workshops in Wales to Boost Business Productivity
Enhance AI knowledge and boost business productivity with exclusive workshops in Wales conducted by AI specialist Cavefish.
OpenAI Request for NYT Files Sparks Copyright Infringement Battle
OpenAI's request for NYT files sparks copyright infringement battle. NYT raises concerns over access to reporters' notes & articles.
OpenAI Faces Security Concerns After 2023 Breach: What You Need to Know
Stay informed about OpenAI's security concerns post-2023 breach. Learn how to protect your data while using ChatGPT AI chatbot.
Hacker Breaches OpenAI, Exposing ChatGPT Designs: Cybersecurity Expert Warns of Growing Threats
Protect your AI technology from hackers! Cybersecurity expert warns of growing threats after OpenAI breach exposes ChatGPT designs.